Hi Hugo, I don't know too much about Fluorine, and other implied projects but my understanding is that, if as you say, your project has new code and is not a fork of other project, I think your work is original and that mean you should not have any problem. If you author the code then you're in control and have nothing to fear.
My recommendation is that you add a LICENSE to the project (for example Apache License v2.0 or MIT, first one is more compliant with apache projects, but second would be ok too). You can do this in few minutes creating the file in gihub as the rest of projects and copy/paste the license. You can take a look at any Apache project. Thanks for contributing. El dom., 16 sept. 2018 a las 17:11, hferreira (<hferreira...@gmail.com>) escribió: > It was based on fluorine, however it's a complete new project (not a fork) > and focus only on AMF with supported class from .NET Standard and not .NET > Framework. > > FluorineFx was deprecated for years now and the website does not exists any > more as any contact. > > This project (not mine) https://github.com/hinaria/rtmpsharp was also > based > on FluorineFx but target for RTMP only and also don't have any header info > (does not mean that is correct, it's true but also that it's not wrong). > > I don't get any money with this project and it's open source and also don't > have more time to change it. > > I would like to have AMF for .NET Core (or Standard) and as I didn't find > one and always benefit from open source, I decided to share in github but > do > you believe that it's safer to remove from github ? > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/ > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
