Its this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1342
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Robert, Which one is the Jira to fix the QuickStart fat jar issue? > > On Friday, April 10, 2015, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > > > We actually have 7 fixes for 0.8.2: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > > > So if you want we can cut a 0.8.2 release. > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > If it's just a quick fix we could backport it to 0.8 and create a 0.8.2 > > > release. > > > > > > I'm not sure if it's worth creating a release for one minor issue. We > > could > > > think about some other minor stuff to fix as well. For example, we > could > > > fix > > > > > > "Impossible to output data to an HBase table" > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1828 > > > > > > If we include several fixes, it would be a maintenance release that > also > > > required some testing.. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > On 09 Apr 2015, at 23:22, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Maybe we should just do quick patch release on 0.8.x branch to fix > > > this, > > > > Robert? > > > > > > > > Is there a reason, why the fix has not been back ported to 0.8? As > you > > > > said, the fat jar gets very big, but that is still better than empty. > > > > > > > > I am in favour of this. Big +1. > > > > > > > > 1) This is not the first time a user has run into this > > > > 2) It makes for a very bad first time experience using the system and > > > > defeats the purpose of a quickstart > > > > 3) It's not a lot of work to get the vote started and the RC would > not > > > > need a lot of testing > > > > > > > > I know we are currently voting on the 0.9.0-milestone-1 release, but > > > since > > > > it is not an official stable release, I can see people sticking to > > 0.8. I > > > > think we don't even plan to link to the milestone release as the > > primary > > > > download. > > > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > >
