All right, you should have permissions now.

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Andra Lungu <lungu.an...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sure, but first I need permissions! :)
>
> "*NOTE*: Due to spamming, we can not give every confluence user edit
> permissions to the wiki. Just write to the dev@flink.apache.org (you can
> also email to rmetzger <at> apache.org) mailing list to get edit
> permissions."
>
> My user is lungu.andra
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> vasilikikala...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your feedback and ideas everyone!
> >
> > @Andra, how about moving the roadmap to the wiki?
> >
> > On 20 May 2015 at 15:48, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > :-D
> > >
> > > Great!
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Andra Lungu <lungu.an...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Kostas,
> > > >
> > > > We're way ahead of you! The first draft of the blog post is
> internally
> > > > reviewed as we speak ;)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This is very cool!
> > > > >
> > > > > Would also love to see a blog post on Gelly at some point, perhaps
> > > > > finishing off with the roadmap
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Andra Lungu <
> lungu.an...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Apache TinkerPop made it to the wish-list :)
> > > > > > Thanks, Fabian!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <
> > > > > pomperma...@okkam.it>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > You're definitely right Fabian +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Fabian Hueske <
> > fhue...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Integration with Apache TinkerPop3 could also be interesting.
> > > > > > > > TinkerPop3 is an API for transactional and analytical graph
> > > > > processing
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > supported by several Graph engines/databases.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It might be interesting to see if/how Gelly's and TinkerPop's
> > > > > concepts
> > > > > > > > match and think about whether it makes sense to integrate the
> > two
> > > > > > > projects
> > > > > > > > in some way.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2015-05-18 12:20 GMT+02:00 Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <
> > > > > > > g...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Great job putting together this roadmap!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regarding 1) you may find this work relevant:
> > > > > > > > > http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00626v1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regarding 2) the semi-streaming model allows polylog(n)
> > passes.
> > > > > > > > > If you allow only one pass, it's a streaming model.
> > > > > > > > > In addition, I think models such as the turnstile/fully
> > dynamic
> > > > > (with
> > > > > > > > > addition and deletion) would be more appropriate than the
> > > > > incremental
> > > > > > > > one.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regarding 5) (when combined with 2) there are some good
> > recent
> > > > > > > algorithms
> > > > > > > > > for partitioning that you might want to look at.
> > > > > > > > > http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2556213
> > > > > > > > > http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2339722
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Gianmarco
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 18 May 2015 at 12:42, Vasiliki Kalavri <
> > > > > vasilikikala...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > thank you Andra for putting together this nice document
> and
> > > for
> > > > > > > > sharing!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Gelly is already in a state that matches the basic
> > > > functionality
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > existing distributed graph libraries. We're very happy
> for
> > > this
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > very grateful to everyone who has contributed so far!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We are also very excited to keep on extending Gelly and
> our
> > > > > vision
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > turn it into something much more than "yet another
> library
> > > for
> > > > > > > running
> > > > > > > > > > PageRank-like algorithms". The document that Andra has
> > shared
> > > > > > > contains
> > > > > > > > > > ongoing work and our ideas on mid- and long-term plans,
> in
> > > > order
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > this happen :)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We would love to get the community's feedback on this, so
> > > > please
> > > > > > feel
> > > > > > > > > free
> > > > > > > > > > to comment on the doc or discuss individual points here.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > Vasia.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 18 May 2015 at 11:01, Andra Lungu <
> > lungu.an...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Squirrels,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The following document is intended to give you an
> insight
> > > on
> > > > > > where
> > > > > > > > > > Flink's
> > > > > > > > > > > Graph API, Gelly, is at the moment and especially on
> the
> > > > > > direction
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > it's heading in the near future.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11ovK1xZZTl3Qinw6Ud1rqpaDhTvRHDv8PWBzcHITFkM/edit?usp=sharing
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > We would love to hear about your comments/ suggestions/
> > > > > additions
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > wish-list :)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > Andra
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to