Btw: I noticed that all streaming modules depend on flink-core,
flink-runtime, flink-clients and flink-java. Is there a particular reason
why the streaming connectors depend on flink-clients and flink-java?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:41 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:

> I see the reason why you want to add flink-scala as a dependency to
> flink-streaming-core. However, it does not feel right to add an API package
> to a core package IMHO.
>
> But I noticed that flink-streaming-core also depends on flink-java. Which
> seems odd to me as well. I'm not a streaming expert and thus cannot tell
> much about the reasons why a core package has a dependency on an API
> package but for me this looks more like an indicator for a necessary
> restructuring of our packages. Maybe someone working on the streaming parts
> can chime in and shed some light on the required dependencies.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:13 PM Gábor Gévay <gga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to ask if it would be OK if I added flink-scala as a
>> dependency to flink-streaming-core. An alternative would be to move
>> the Scala typeutils to flink-core (to where the Java typeutils are).
>> Why I need this:
>>
>> While I am implementing the fast median calculation for windows as
>> part of my Google Summer of Code project, I am refactoring the way
>> sum, min, max, etc. are accessing the user-specified field
>> (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/684). Currently both the logic
>> of their aggregators are duplicated for the different kinds of types
>> (tuple, pojo, array, Scala case class, simple), and also the field
>> access logic is duplicated across the different aggregators. In my
>> GSoC project I will implement some further methods (avg, variance,
>> etc.) that take the same kind of parameters as sum, min, etc., so it
>> will be neccassary to have the field access logic centralized (this is
>> the FieldAccessor class in the PR). It would be convenient if this
>> could also handle Scala case classes, for which CaseClassTypeInfo is
>> needed which is currently in flink-scala.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Gabor
>>
>

Reply via email to