I think this is a very good idea and very urgent (because of the issues you 
outlined and for the user experience of *not* having to compile your own 
version). Big +1.

On 24 Jun 2015, at 11:45, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I am aware of at least two Flink users which were facing various issues
> with HDFS when using Flink.
> 
> *Issues observed:*
> - HDFS client trying to connect to the standby Namenode
> "org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(org.apache.hadoop.ipc.StandbyException):
> Operation category READ is not supported in state standby"
> -  java.io.IOException: Bad response ERROR for block
> BP-1335380477-172.22.5.37-1424696786673:blk_1107843111_34301064 from
> datanode 172.22.5.81:50010
> at
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer$ResponseProcessor.run(DFSOutputStream.java:732)
> 
> - Caused by:
> org.apache.hadoop.ipc.RemoteException(java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException):
> 0
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.blockmanagement.DatanodeManager.getDatanodeStorageInfos(DatanodeManager.java:478)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.updatePipelineInternal(FSNamesystem.java:6039)
>        at
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem.updatePipeline(FSNamesystem.java:6002)
> 
> 
> I've added the exceptions to the email so that users facing these issues
> can find a solution for them.
> I suspect that all these issues are caused by the Hadoop 2.2.0 client we
> are packing into the binary releases.
> 
> Upgrading the HDFS client to the same version as the HDFS installation
> (say, for example 2.4.1) resolved all issues.
> 
> Therefore, I propose to provide Hadoop 2.4.0 and Hadoop 2.6.0 binaries on
> the Flink download page.
> For the 0.9.0 release, I would do another VOTE on providing these two
> binaries.
> 
> I've also filed a JIRA to provide a Flink build which doesn't include
> Hadoop at all (relying on the version provided by the user through the
> classpath): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2268
> 
> 
> Let me know what you think!
> 
> Robert

Reply via email to