Locally yes. Here's the stack trace:
2015-09-21 22:22:46 Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.75-b04 mixed mode): "Attach Listener" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d104e800 nid=0x4013 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE "Service Thread" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d3807000 nid=0x4c03 runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE "C2 CompilerThread1" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d2001000 nid=0x4a03 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE "C2 CompilerThread0" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d201e000 nid=0x4803 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE "Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d3012800 nid=0x451b runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE "Finalizer" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d4005800 nid=0x3303 in Object.wait() [0x000000011430d000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x00000007ef504858> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:135) - locked <0x00000007ef504858> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:151) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:209) "Reference Handler" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d480b000 nid=0x3103 in Object.wait() [0x000000011420a000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x00000007ef504470> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133) - locked <0x00000007ef504470> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) "main" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d4800000 nid=0xd03 runnable [0x000000010b764000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.accept(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:398) at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:530) at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:498) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.SocketClientSinkTest.testSocketSinkRetryAccess(SocketClientSinkTest.java:315) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55) at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103) "VM Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d4005000 nid=0x2f03 runnable "GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d2005800 nid=0x1f03 runnable "GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1800000 nid=0x2103 runnable "GC task thread#2 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1804800 nid=0x2303 runnable "GC task thread#3 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1805000 nid=0x2503 runnable "GC task thread#4 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1805800 nid=0x2703 runnable "GC task thread#5 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1806800 nid=0x2903 runnable "GC task thread#6 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1807000 nid=0x2b03 runnable "GC task thread#7 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1807800 nid=0x2d03 runnable "VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007ff9d1006000 nid=0x4e03 waiting on condition JNI global references: 193 On 21 September 2015 at 22:13, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > This happened locally on your machine? > > Can you dump the stack-trace and post it? "jps <processid> > > stacktrace.txt" or so... > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < > vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi squirrels, > > > > I've been meaning to merge a PR (#1520), but my local maven build gets > > stuck at > > org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.BarrierBufferMassiveRandomTest. > > It looks like a deadlock.. The build just hangs there and top shows no > > CPU/memory load. Anyone else has experienced the same? I'm on OS X 10.10. > > > > Thanks! > > -Vasia. > > >
