@Stephan: You mean all tags should be protected, not only those under rel? 2016-01-13 11:43 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>:
> +1 for protecting the master branch. > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Li, Chengxiang <chengxiang...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > +1 on the original style. > > Master branch disable force pushing in case of misusing and feature > branch > > enable force pushing for flexible developing. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gyula Fóra [mailto:gyf...@apache.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:36 PM > > To: dev@flink.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Git force pushing and deletion of branchs > > > > +1 for protecting the master branch. > > > > I also don't see any reason why anyone should force push there > > > > Gyula > > > > Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2016. jan. 13., > Sze, > > 11:07): > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > Lately, ASF Infra has changed the write permissions of all Git > > > repositories twice. > > > > > > Originally, it was not possible to force into the master branch. > > > A few weeks ago, infra disabled also force pushing into other branches. > > > > > > Now, this has changed again after the issue was discussed with the ASF > > > board. > > > The current situation is the following: > > > - force pushing is allowed on all branched, including master > > > - branches and tags can be deleted (not sure if this applies as well > > > for the master branch) > > > - "the 'protected' portions of git to primarily focus on refs/tags/rel > > > - thus any tags under rel, will have their entire commit history." > > > > > > I am not 100% sure which exact parts of the repository are protected > > > now as I am not very much into the details of Git. > > > However, I believe we need to create new tags under rel for our > > > previous releases to protect them. > > > > > > In addition, I would like to propose to ask Infra to add protection > > > for the master branch. I can only recall very few situations where > > > changes had to be reverted. I am much more in favor of a reverting > > > commit now and then compared to a branch that can be arbitrarily > changed. > > > > > > What do you think about this? > > > > > > Best, Fabian > > > > > >
