Fair enough 2016-02-05 14:09 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>:
> I would also be in favor of continuing the RC, if we find nothing more > problematic > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Thanks for the RC. The documentation version is a really minor issue > > which most people won't even notice because they use the online > > documentation. I wouldn't create a new RC just for fixing that. > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> On 05 Feb 2016, at 12:17, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> I compared the RC1 branch to the release-0.10.2 tag and went over the > > diff > > >> (less than 2k changed lines, mostly added tests). > > >> > > >> Issues: > > >> - the docs/_config.yml needs to be updated to version 0.10.2 > > >> > > >> Added / changed dependencies in pom files: > > >> - Kryo was added to flink-storm > > >> - ASM was added to flink-gelly-scala > > >> - zkclient was added to flink-connector-kafka > > >> - Netty was downgraded to version 4.0.27.Final in the root pom.xml > > >> > > >> All of these dependencies changes are fine because we had dependencies > > on > > >> these artifacts already. > > >> I did not see any added dependencies (web stuff, etc). > > >> > > >> -1 for the RC due to the non-updated docs config. However, I'd suggest > > to > > >> continue testing this RC before creating a new one. > > > > > > We had this issue before with the docs. I would actually like to not > > block the release on this, because the docs on the website are updated > from > > the 0.10 release branch anyways and this will only affect people who > check > > out the docs locally. > > > > > > If you insist or other people see this as a blocker as well, I can > > certainly create another RC. > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > PS: I’ve added a note to the releasing Wiki entry. > > > > > >
