Ok, if that is what we promised let's stick to that.
Then would you suggest to open a release-2.0 branch and merge it there?

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hey,
> JIRA was down for quite a while yesterday. Sadly, I don't think we can
> merge the change because its API breaking.
> One of the promises of the 1.0 release is that we are not breaking any APIs
> in the 1.x.y series of Flink. We can fix those issues with a 2.x release.
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:27 AM, Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The JIRA issue is FLINK-3610.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Márton Balassi <
> balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I have just come across a shortcoming of the streaming Scala API: it
> > > completely lacks the Scala implementation of the DataStreamSink and
> > > instead the Java version is used. [1]
> > >
> > > I would regard this as a bug that needs a fix for 1.0.1. Unfortunately
> > > this is also api-breaking.
> > >
> > > Will post it to JIRA shortly - but issues.apache.org is unresponsive
> for
> > > me currently. Wanted to raise the issue here as it might affect the
> api.
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-streaming-scala
> > > /src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/scala/DataStream.scala
> > > #L928-L929
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to