+1 Regards, Chiwan Park
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 11:24 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 > > I just went through the master and release-1.0 branch, and most important > fixes are already in the release-1.0 branch. > I would also move this commit into the release branch: > "[FLINK-3636] Add ThrottledIterator to WindowJoin jar" > https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/f09d68a05efb4afeb7b8498d35201e8324d6c096 > > From the pull requests I would include: > "[FLINK-3651] Fix faulty RollingSink Restore" > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1830 > > Anything else? > > I would like to manage the release, but I'm on vacation next week, so I > think somebody else should do it ;) > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, there is also the Rich Scala Window Functions, and the tests that >> used >>>> to address wrong JAR directories. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Big +1, let's get this rolling... ;) >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < >> aljos...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> I’m aware of one critical fix and one somewhat critical fix since >>>> 1.0.0. >>>>> One concerns data loss in the RollingSink, the other is a bug in a >> window >>>>> trigger. I would like to release a bugfix release since some people >> are >>>>> restricted to using released versions and are also depending on the >>>>> RollingSink. For them, now having a bugfix release would be a blocker. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think? Are there any other critical bugs/fixes that we >> are >>>>> aware of? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Aljoscha >>>>> >>>> >>
