One thing to consider: there are still many people using Storm 0.9 or Storm 0.10.
There was a recent "Survey" on Storm user list: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/storm-user/201608.mbox/%3C5DCE24EC-0E48-4AA1-A700-F2AB48248304%40gmail.com%3E Just want to point out, the we might "cut off" those users. -Matthias On 09/02/2016 03:25 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > This should be of concern mostly to the users of the Storm compatibility > layer: > > We just received a pull request [1] for updating the Storm > compatibility layer to support Storm versions >= 1.0.0. This is a > major change because all Storm imports have changed their namespace > due to package renaming. > > If we merged this pull request we would have two modules, one for > Storm < 1.0.0 and one for Storm >= 1.0.0. This would require a lot of > duplicate work for the Flink community. > > Thus, I would suggest to remove the Storm compatibility for < 1.0.0 > and focus on supporting 1.x.x versions of Storm. > > What do you think? In particular, how do Storm users think about this? > > Cheers, > Max > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2452 >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
