+1 good suggestion. On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
> The module would have both dependencies, but both are provided anyways, so > that would not be much of an issue, I think. > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I think this only holds true for modules which depend on the batch or > > streaming counter part, respectively. We could refactor these modules by > > pulling out common types which are independent of streaming/batch and are > > used by the batch and streaming module. > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > I don't think it's that easy. The streaming connectors have > > flink-streaming > > > as dependency while the batch connectors have the batch dependencies. > > > > > > Combining them would mean that users always have all dependencies, > right? > > > > > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 at 15:41 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for Fabian's suggestion > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Swapnil Chougule < > > > the.swapni...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > It will be good to have one module flink-connectors (union of > > streaming > > > > and > > > > > batch connectors). > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Swapnil > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > > > > > right now, we have two separate Maven modules for batch and > > streaming > > > > > > connectors (flink-batch-connectors and > flink-streaming-connectors) > > > that > > > > > > contain modules for the individual external systems and storage > > > formats > > > > > > such as HBase, Cassandra, Avro, Elasticsearch, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > Some of these systems can be used in streaming as well as batch > > jobs > > > as > > > > > for > > > > > > instance HBase, Cassandra, and Elasticsearch. However, due to the > > > > > separate > > > > > > main modules for streaming and batch connectors, we currently > need > > to > > > > > > decide where to put a connector. For example, the > > > > > flink-connector-cassandra > > > > > > module is located in flink-streaming-connectors but includes a > > > > > > CassandraInputFormat and CassandraOutputFormat (i.e., a batch > > source > > > > and > > > > > > sink). > > > > > > > > > > > > In my opinion, it would be better to just merge > > > flink-batch-connectors > > > > > and > > > > > > flink-streaming-connectors into a joint flink-connectors module. > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be only an internal restructuring of code and not be > > > visible > > > > > to > > > > > > users (unless we change the module names of the individual > > connectors > > > > > which > > > > > > is not necessary, IMO). > > > > > > > > > > > > What do others think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, Fabian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
