Thanks Ufuk for stepping up as RM! Regarding whether FLINK-4723 / FLINK-4727 should be included: The failing test on PR #2580 is unrelated to the change. However, I think it’s reasonable to skip them if we’re aiming to get a RC out today, as they’ll need more time for reviewing. Not including them will only pose problems if users are consuming Kafka topics across Flink’s connector & high-level Kafka consumers when using Kafka 0.8.
We don’t really have users reporting problems on this yet, so I’d say it’s ok to skip them for 1.1.3 :) On October 4, 2016 at 6:12:06 PM, Fabian Hueske (fhue...@gmail.com) wrote: Thanks Ufuk for stepping up as release manager! Yes, I will backport the fix for FLINK-4311 to Flink 1.1.3 and merge it today. 2016-10-04 12:07 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>: If there are no objections I would like to be the release manager for this release. Futhermore, I would like to add FLINK-4732 (Maven junction plugin security issue) to the list of fixes for this release. Other than that, I think the list in this thread is good and we should now focus on getting a RC out. I would really like to do this today in order to start testing. The current state of affairs is as follows: - FLINK-4732 (Maven junction plugin security issue) has a fix in https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2586. @Max: Can you merge this today? - FLINK-4702 (Kafka async offset commit) has been merged. - FLINK-4329 (streaming file sources) has a fix in https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2546, which needs both another round of review and backporting to 1.1. Kostas Kloudas is working on this with Stephan as reviewer. @Stephan, Kostas: Do you think that this can be merged today? - FLINK-4311 (TableInputFormat) has a fix in https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2330 and is good to merge according to Fabian. @Fabian: Can you merge this today? - FLINK-4727 (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2580) and FLINK-4723 (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2585) have been issued recently and look like they could be skipped for 1.1.3 (given that there is a test failure in #2580). I'm not too familiar with the Kafka connector though. @Tzu-Li, Stephan: Can you please comment on both of these whether they need to go in? – Ufuk