Thanks Ufuk for stepping up as RM!

Regarding whether FLINK-4723 / FLINK-4727 should be included:
The failing test on PR #2580 is unrelated to the change.
However, I think it’s reasonable to skip them if we’re aiming to get a RC out 
today, as they’ll need more time for reviewing.
Not including them will only pose problems if users are consuming Kafka topics 
across Flink’s connector & high-level Kafka consumers when using Kafka 0.8.

We don’t really have users reporting problems on this yet, so I’d say it’s ok 
to skip them for 1.1.3 :)

On October 4, 2016 at 6:12:06 PM, Fabian Hueske (fhue...@gmail.com) wrote:

Thanks Ufuk for stepping up as release manager!

Yes, I will backport the fix for FLINK-4311 to Flink 1.1.3 and merge it today.

2016-10-04 12:07 GMT+02:00 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>:
If there are no objections I would like to be the release manager for
this release.

Futhermore, I would like to add FLINK-4732 (Maven junction plugin
security issue) to the list of fixes for this release. Other than
that, I think the list in this thread is good and we should now focus
on getting a RC out. I would really like to do this today in order to
start testing.

The current state of affairs is as follows:

- FLINK-4732 (Maven junction plugin security issue) has a fix in
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2586. @Max: Can you merge this
today?

- FLINK-4702 (Kafka async offset commit) has been merged.

- FLINK-4329 (streaming file sources) has a fix in
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2546, which needs both another
round of review and backporting to 1.1. Kostas Kloudas is working on
this with Stephan as reviewer. @Stephan, Kostas: Do you think that
this can be merged today?

- FLINK-4311 (TableInputFormat) has a fix in
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2330 and is good to merge
according to Fabian. @Fabian: Can you merge this today?

- FLINK-4727 (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2580) and
FLINK-4723 (https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2585) have been
issued recently and look like they could be skipped for 1.1.3 (given
that there is a test failure in #2580). I'm not too familiar with the
Kafka connector though. @Tzu-Li, Stephan: Can you please comment on
both of these whether they need to go in?

– Ufuk

Reply via email to