+1 Looking forward this release !
Regards JB On Oct 25, 2016, 14:43, at 14:43, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: >+1 for a bugfix release soon. > >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >wrote: > >> Thanks fort starting this Ufuk. >> >> I would like to add the following issues to 1.1.4: >> >> Build errors due to Storm dependencies *(fix pending)* >> - [FLINK-4298] [storm compatibility] Add proper repository for >Closure >> dependencies. >> >> Stability on S3 considering eventual consistency *(fix pending)* >> - [FLINK-4218] [checkpoints] Do not fail checkpoints when state >size >> cannot be determined >> >> Avoiding Zombie TaskManagers *(still needs to be done)* >> - [FLINK-3347] [akka] TaskManager (or its ActorSystem) need to >restart >> in case they notice quarantine >> >> Adding a limit to the amount of data spilled during checkpoint >alignments >> *(fix >> is work in progress)* >> - [FLINK-4904] [checkpoints] Add a limit for how much data may be >> spilled in checkpoint alignments >> >> >> I can push the first two fixes to the 1.1.4 branch in a bit, the >fourth one >> later today. >> The third one (akka) is still pending. >> >> Best, >> Stephan >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Hey all, >> > >> > I would like to start the discussion for kicking off the next bug >fix >> > release, Flink 1.1.4. What do you think about aiming for a RC by >end >> > of this week? >> > >> > Users reported some instabilities/inconveniences that would be good >to >> fix. >> > >> > Personally, I would like to backport the following fixes: >> > >> > (1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4619: Answer client >if >> > savepoint restore fails (Already merged for master, needs minimal >> > adjustment for 1.1) >> > (2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4715: Safety net >for >> > stuck task cancellation (Already reviewed for master, waiting for >> > tests to finish of backport) >> > (3) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4510: Always create >> > CheckpointCoordinator (Already merged for master, needs minimal >> > adjustments for 1.1) >> > >> > Furthermore, I would like to address the following: >> > >> > (4) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4445: Add option to >> > ignore unmatched state when restoring from savepoint >> > (5) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4894: Don't block >on >> > buffer request after broadcast event >> > >> > Strictly speaking, the (4) is not a bug fix. But given that it >would >> > only add an optional flag to savepoint restoring and should have >been >> > addressed for 1.1.0 already, I would like to get it in. >> > >>
