Hi Boris, I think it is a good idea to gather some more metrics about Flink's code quality. This can help to address deficiencies and finally improve Flink's code and test coverage. So +1 for adding it if it does not conflict with any Apache regulations. But given anlaysis.apache.org it seems to be fine.
Cheers, Till On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Boris Osipov <boris_osi...@epam.com> wrote: > Hi community, > > What do you think about adding Flink code to analysis via Sonarqube > http://www.sonarqube.org/ tool? > I've ran analysis on my machine and I'd like to share short report here > https://goo.gl/GdfoLm > As you can see, there are some problems with code quality detected by tool. > > I found that Apache Software Foundation has the Sonarqube code analytics > service https://analysis.apache.org/. > In addition, Travice CI has integration with Sonarqube.com. It is free for > open source projects. > We can use one of them for analysis. > > Please, share your thoughts. > > Best regards, > Boris Osipov > >
