Hi Alexey, I agree with your proposal to use "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" or even "yyyy-MM-ddTHH:mm:ss" to follow the ISO standard per default but still give the user the possibility to configure it.
Cheers, Till On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Alexey Demin <diomi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Till > > I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5431 > > I prefer use "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss" because it's more similar to ISO date > format. > We can't stay only "HH:mm:ss" because this formatter are using for output > data on console (System.out ) > and for longrunning applications print hours without date very > uninformative. > > What do you think? > > Thanks, > Alexey > > > 2017-01-09 17:25 GMT+04:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>: > > > Hi Alexey, > > > > this is a good proposal. Could you open a corresponding JIRA issue for > this > > change? > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Alexey Demin <diomi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > In ExecutionGraphMessages we have code > > > > > > private val DATE_FORMATTER: SimpleDateFormat = new > > > SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy HH:mm:ss") > > > > > > But sometimes it cause confusion when main logger configured with > > > "dd/MM/yyyy". > > > > > > What are you thinking about making this format configurable or maybe > stay > > > only HH:mm:ss > > > > > > Thanks, Alexey > > > > > >
