Ok I missed the IT part, if it is an integration test class you could use
mvn integration-test -DwildcardSuites=.... the mvn target is different.

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Stavros Kontopoulos <
st.kontopou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Weird for me it works. I can post the output here if you want.
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Anton Solovev <anton_solo...@epam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for help, but unfortunately it keeps going through all tests
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stavros Kontopoulos [mailto:st.kontopou...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 11:45 PM
>> To: dev@flink.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: flink-ml test
>>
>> Adding to previous, "suites" option is technically more correct for the
>> case since wildcard is for running everything under a package (subpackages
>> included):
>> mvn test -Dsuites=org.apache.flink.ml.math.BreezeMathSuite
>>
>> This runs all tests under ml:
>> mvn test -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.flink.ml
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Stavros Kontopoulos <
>> st.kontopou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > typo:remove the second BreezeMathSuite..
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Stavros Kontopoulos <
>> > st.kontopou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> For running a specific test under flink-ml:
>> >> mvn test -DwildcardSuites=org.apache.flink.ml.math.BreezeMathSuite
>> >> BreezeMathSuite
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Stavros
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Driesprong, Fokko
>> >> <fo...@driesprong.frl
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Anton,
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm curious what tests fail. I run the tests by using `mvn verify`
>> >>> in the flink-ml directory. My output is:
>> >>> http://pastebin.com/WmgGMb8g. I ran this against the current master.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Fokko
>> >>>
>> >>> 2017-01-27 9:21 GMT+01:00 Anton Solovev <anton_solo...@epam.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Yes, I had that commit, I tested master branch at that time
>> >>> >
>> >>> > -----Original Message-----
>> >>> > From: Till Rohrmann [mailto:trohrm...@apache.org]
>> >>> > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 6:04 PM
>> >>> > To: dev@flink.apache.org
>> >>> > Subject: Re: flink-ml test
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Hi Anton,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > which build are you using? I've recently (Monday) pushed a fix for
>> >>> > the StochasticOutlierSelectionITSuite
>> >>> > (32e1675aa38eec4a15272d62977df
>> >>> e3ddbe92401).
>> >>> > If you have this commit and the test is still failing, then I have
>> >>> > to
>> >>> look
>> >>> > into it again.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Cheers,
>> >>> > Till
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Anton Solovev <
>> >>> anton_solo...@epam.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > > Thank you Theodore
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > StochasticOutlierSelectionITSuite has failed twice, but at third
>> >>> time
>> >>> > > it’s okey, I can’t share logs it disappeared somewhere in travis
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > 25.01.17, 18:27 пользователь "Theodore Vasiloudis" <
>> >>> > > theodoros.vasilou...@gmail.com> написал:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >     Hello Anton,
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >     I usually run specific local tests through IDEA, or test or
>> >>> > > the whole ML
>> >>> > >     module (run mvn test in the flink-ml root dir) . It should
>> >>> > > be possible to
>> >>> > >     run specific tests through maven [1], but I haven't been
>> >>> > > able to make this
>> >>> > >     work.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >     Which test is failing for you?
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >     [1]
>> >>> > >     http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-
>> >>> > > plugin/examples/single-test.html
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >     On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Anton Solovev
>> >>> > > <anton_solo...@epam.com
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > >     wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >     > Hi folk,
>> >>> > >     >
>> >>> > >     > I have a failed integration test on travis in flink-ml
>> package.
>> >>> > >     > How can I run specific IT Class of this on my local
>> >>> > > machine
>> >>> with
>> >>> > > console
>> >>> > >     > logs output?
>> >>> > >     >
>> >>> > >     > Thanks,
>> >>> > >     > Anton Solovev
>> >>> > >     >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to