Hi guys, I have made an additional optimization[1] related to megamorphic call issue that Greg mentioned earlier. The optimization[2] improves execution time around ~13%, while the original code from FLINK-5734 is ~11%.
IMHO, the improvement from metamorphic call optimization is very small compared to the code we have to introduce. So, I think we can just go with the PR that we currently have. What do you think? [1] https://github.com/heytitle/flink/commit/8e38b4d738b9953337361c62a8d77e909327d28f [2]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PcdCdFX4bGecO6Lb5dLI2nww2NoeaA8c3MgbEdsVmk0/edit#gid=598217386 Best, Pat -- View this message in context: http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-18-Code-Generation-for-improving-sorting-performance-tp16486p16923.html Sent from the Apache Flink Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
