I've now started building the next release candidate. On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Gyula, > > I'm trying to push Stefan R. to get the RocksDB fixes in asap. > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Any updates on this? >> >> It would be nice to get this out soon, the Kafka bug is hurting our prod >> jobs big time. >> >> Thanks, >> Gyula >> >> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017, 15:27 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > @Stefan: What's the state with the RocksDB fixes? I would be +1 to do >> this. >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > Yes, aljoscha already opened one against master: >> > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3670 >> > > >> > > On 04.04.2017 17:57, Ted Yu wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Should the commits be reverted from master branch as well ? >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < >> aljos...@apache.org> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> The commits around FLINK-5808 have been reverted on release-1.2. >> > >>> >> > >>>> On 4. Apr 2017, at 12:16, Stefan Richter < >> s.rich...@data-artisans.com >> > > >> > >>> >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I have created a custom build of RocksDB 4.11.2 that fixes a >> > significant >> > >>> >> > >>> performance problem with append operations. I think this should >> > >>> definitely >> > >>> be part of the 1.2.1 release because this is already blocking some >> > users. >> > >>> What is missing is uploading the jar to maven central and a testing >> > run, >> > >>> e.g. with some misbehaved job that has large state. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> Am 04.04.2017 um 11:57 schrieb Robert Metzger < >> rmetz...@apache.org>: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Thank you for opening a PR for this. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Chesnay, do you need more reviews for the metrics changes / >> > backports? >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Are there any other release blockers for 1.2.1, or are we good to >> go? >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < >> > aljos...@apache.org> >> > >>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>>> I created a PR for the revert: https://github.com/apache/ >> > >>> >> > >>> flink/pull/3664 >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On 3. Apr 2017, at 18:32, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> +1 for options (1), but also invest the time to fix it properly >> for >> > >>> >> > >>> 1.2.2 >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Kostas Kloudas < >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> k.klou...@data-artisans.com> >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> +1 for 1 >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2017, at 5:52 PM, Till Rohrmann < >> trohrm...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> +1 for option 1) >> > >>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Fabian Hueske < >> fhue...@gmail.com >> > > >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 to option 1) >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> 2017-04-03 16:57 GMT+02:00 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Looks like #1 is better - 1.2.1 would be at least as stable >> as >> > >>> >> > >>> 1.2.0 >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> aljos...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just so we’re all on the same page. ;-) >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> There was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5808 >> > which >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> was >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> a >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> bug that we initially discovered in Flink 1.2 which was/is >> > about >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> missing >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> verification for the correctness of the combination of >> > >>> >> > >>> parallelism >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> and >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> max-parallelism. Due to lacking test coverage this >> introduced >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> two >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> more >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> bugs: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188: Some >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> setParallelism() methods can't cope with default >> parallelism >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6209: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> StreamPlanEnvironment always has a parallelism of 1 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO, the options are: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) revert the changes made for FLINK-5808 on the >> release-1.2 >> > >>> >> > >>> branch >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> and >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> live with the bug still being present >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) put in more work to fix FLINK-5808 which requires fixing >> > some >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> problems >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> that have existed for a long time with how the parallelism >> is >> > >>> >> > >>> set in >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> streaming programs >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Aljoscha >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31. Mar 2017, at 21:34, Robert Metzger < >> > rmetz...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know what is best to do, but I think releasing >> 1.2.1 >> > >>> >> > >>> with >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> potentially more bugs than 1.2.0 is not a good option. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect a good workaround for FLINK-6188 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188> is >> > setting >> > >>> >> > >>> the >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> parallelism manually for operators that can't cope with >> the >> > >>> >> > >>> default >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> -1 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> parallelism. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Aljoscha Krettek < >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean reverting the changes around FLINK-5808 [1]? >> This >> > is >> > >>> >> > >>> what >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced the follow-up FLINK-6188 [2]. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5808 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017, at 19:10, Robert Metzger wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think reverting FLINK-6188 for the 1.2 branch might >> be a >> > >>> >> > >>> good >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> idea. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-6188 introduced two new bugs, so undoing the >> > FLINK-6188 >> > >>> >> > >>> fix >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> will >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lead >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only to one known bug in 1.2.1, instead of an uncertain >> > >>> >> > >>> number of >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> issues. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So 1.2.1 is not going to be worse than 1.2.0 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The fix will hopefully make it into 1.2.2 then. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any other thoughts on this? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Fabian Hueske < >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> fhue...@gmail.com> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I merged the fix for FLINK-6044 to the release-1.2 and >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> release-1.1 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-03-31 15:02 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske < >> > fhue...@gmail.com >> > >>>> >> > >>>> : >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also backport the fix for FLINK-6044 to >> Flink >> > >>> >> > >>> 1.2.1. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll take care of that. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-03-30 18:50 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek < >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> aljos...@apache.org >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> : >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6188 >> turns >> > >>> >> > >>> out to >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> be >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> a >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more involved, see my comments on the PR: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3616. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I said there, maybe we should revert the commits >> > >>> >> > >>> regarding >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parallelism/max-parallelism changes and release and >> then >> > >>> >> > >>> fix >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> it >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> later. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017, at 23:08, Aljoscha Krettek >> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I commented on FLINK-6214: I think it's working as >> > >>> >> > >>> intended, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> although >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could fix the javadoc/doc. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017, at 17:35, Timo Walther wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A user reported that all tumbling and slinding >> window >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> assigners >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a pretty obvious bug about offsets. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6214 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should also fix this for 1.2.1. What do >> you >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> think? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Timo >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29/03/17 um 11:30 schrieb Robert Metzger: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Haohui, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that we should fix the parallelism issue. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Otherwise, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.2.1 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release would introduce a new bug. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Haohui Mai < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ricet...@gmail.com> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 (non-binding) >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We recently found out that all jobs submitted >> via UI >> > >>> >> > >>> will >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parallelism of 1, potentially due to FLINK-5808. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Filed FLINK-6209 to track it. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Haohui >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 2:59 AM Chesnay Schepler >> < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ches...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If possible I would like to include FLINK-6183 & >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> FLINK-6184 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They fix 2 metric-related issues that could >> arise >> > >>> >> > >>> when a >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Task is >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancelled very early. (like, right away) >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-6183 fixes a memory leak where the >> > >>> >> > >>> TaskMetricGroup >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> was >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never closed >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-6184 fixes a NullPointerExceptions in the >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buffer >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR here: https://github.com/apache/flin >> k/pull/3611 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26.03.2017 12:35, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I opened a PR for FLINK-6188: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink/pull/3616 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3616> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This improves the previously very sparse test >> > >>> >> > >>> coverage >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> for >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timestamp/watermark assigners and fixes the bug. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2017, at 10:22, Ufuk Celebi < >> > >>> >> > >>> u...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with Aljoscha. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 because of FLINK-6188 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Aljoscha >> > Krettek < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aljos...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I filed this issue, which was observed by a >> > user: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira >> /browse/FLINK-6188 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that’s blocking for 1.2.1. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24 Mar 2017, at 18:57, Ufuk Celebi < >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> u...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC1 doesn't contain Stefan's backport for >> the >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Asynchronous >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshots >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for heap-based keyed state that has been >> > merged. >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Should >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC2 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with that fix since the voting period only >> > starts >> > >>> >> > >>> on >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monday? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it would only mean rerunning the scripts on >> > your >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> side, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right? >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> – Ufuk >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Robert >> > Metzger < >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmetz...@apache.org> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Flink community, >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following >> > candidate >> > >>> >> > >>> as >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 1.2 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .1. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *732e55bd* (* >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/ >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 732e55bd >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repos/asf/flink/commit/732e55b >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d>*) >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-1.2.1-rc1 >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> at: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *http://people.apache.org/~ >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/ >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/~ >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> rmetzger/flink-1.2.1-rc1/ >> > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> * >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the >> key >> > >>> >> > >>> with >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D9839159: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release >> can be >> > >>> >> > >>> found >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at: >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >> > >> > >
