Sorry, you're right Aljosha..the issue number is correct, the link is wrong! The correct one is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6398
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > I think there might be a typo. We haven’t yet reached issue number 6389, > if I’m not mistaken. The latest as I’m writing this is 6410. > > > On 28. Apr 2017, at 10:00, Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> > wrote: > > > > If it's not a problem it will be great for us to include also FLINK-6398 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6938> if it's not a big > deal > > > > Best, > > Flavio > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Zhuoluo Yang < > zhuoluo....@alibaba-inc.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Devs, > >> > >> Thanks for the release plan. > >> > >> Could you also please add the feature FLINK-6196 > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6196> Support dynamic > schema > >> in Table Function? > >> I’d like to update the code as comments left on PR today. > >> I will try to make sure the code is updated before the Apr 30th. > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Zhuoluo 😀 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> 在 2017年4月28日，上午8:48，Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com> 写道： > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Thanks for starting this thread. It would be great to see the following > >> features available in Flink 1.3: > >> > >> * Support for complex schema: FLINK-6033, FLINK-6377 > >> * Various improvements on SQL over group windows: FLINK-6335, FLINK-6373 > >> * StreamTableSink for JDBC and Cassandra: FLINK-6281, FLINK-6225 > >> * Decoupling Flink and Hadoop: FLINK-5998 > >> > >> All of them have gone through at least one round of review so I'm > >> optimistic that they can make it to 1.3 in a day or two. > >> > >> Additionally it would be great to see FLINK-6232 go in, but it depends > on > >> FLINK-5884 so it might be a little bit tough. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Haohui > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:22 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> FLINK-5892 (Restoring state by operator) is also nearing completion, but > >> with only 1 day left before the weekend we're cutting it really short. > >> > >> Since this eliminates a major pain point when updating jobs, as it > >> allows the modification of chains, another day or 2 would be good i > think. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Chesnay > >> > >> On 27.04.2017 18:55, Bowen Li wrote: > >> > >> Hi Ufuk, > >> I'd like to get FLINK-6013 (Adding Datadog Http metrics reporter) > >> > >> into > >> > >> release 1.3. It's in the final state of code review in > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3736 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Bowen > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Zhijiang(wangzhijiang999) < > >> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Ufuk, > >> Thank you for launching this topic! > >> I wish my latest refinement of buffer provider ( > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/ > >> > >> jira/browse/FLINK-6337) to be included in 1.3 and most of the jobs can > >> get benefit from it. And I think it can be completed with the help of > >> > >> your > >> > >> reviews this week. > >> > >> Cheers,Zhijiang--------------------------------------------- > >> ---------------------发件人：Ufuk > >> > >> Celebi <u...@apache.org>发送时间：2017年4月27日(星期四) 22:25收件人：dev < > >> dev@flink.apache.org>抄 送：Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>主 > >> 题：[DISCUSS] Feature Freeze > >> Hey devs! :-) > >> > >> We decided to follow a time-based release model with the upcoming 1.3 > >> release and the planned feature freeze is on Monday, May 1st. > >> > >> I wanted to start a discussion to get a quick overview of the current > >> state of things. > >> > >> - Is everyone on track and aware of the feature freeze? ;) > >> - Are there any major features we want in 1.3 that > >> have not been merged yet? > >> - Do we need to extend the feature freeze, because of an > >> important feature? > >> > >> Would be great to gather a list of features/PRs that we want in the > >> 1.3 release. This could be a good starting point for the release > >> manager (@Robert?). > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Ufuk > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >
