Hi, Fabian, Thanks for the sketch. The structure is pretty well to me, And glad to join in the discussion in google doc.
Cheers, SunJincheng 2017-05-19 14:55 GMT+08:00 Shaoxuan Wang <wshaox...@gmail.com>: > Hello Fabian, > Thanks for drafting the proposal. I like the entire organization in general > and left a few comments. I think this will be a very good kick off to > reorganize the tableAPI&SQL doc. > > -shaoxuan > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I came up with a proposal for the structure of the Table API / SQL > > documentation: > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ENY8tcPadZjoZ4AQ_ > > lRRwWiVpScDkm_4rgxIGWGT5E0/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Feedback and comments are very welcome. > > Once we agree on a structure, we can create skeletons and distribute the > > work. > > > > Cheers, > > Fabian > > > > 2017-05-18 21:01 GMT+02:00 Haohui Mai <ricet...@gmail.com>: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > The Table / SQL component has made significant progress in the last few > > > months (kudos to all contributors). > > > > > > It is a good time to have a documentation to reflect all the changes in > > the > > > Table / SQL side. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:12 AM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thank you Fabian for working on the proposal. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting this discussion Robert. > > > > > > > > > > I think with the next release the Table API / SQL should be moved > up > > in > > > > the > > > > > Application Development menu. > > > > > I also though about restructuring the docs, but it won't be trivial > > to > > > do > > > > > this, IMO because there are many orthogonal aspects: > > > > > - Stream/Batch > > > > > - Table/SQL > > > > > - Scala/Java > > > > > > > > > > and sometimes also common concepts. > > > > > At the moment there are also many new features missing like OVER > > > windows, > > > > > UDAGGs, retraction, StreamTableSinks, time indicator attributes, > > filter > > > > > pushdown, ... > > > > > > > > > > I will try to sketch a new structure in a Google Doc in the next > days > > > and > > > > > share it in this thread. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Fabian > > > > > > > > > > 2017-05-18 14:03 GMT+02:00 Kostas Kloudas < > > k.klou...@data-artisans.com > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > A big +1 as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 18, 2017, at 1:55 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Till Rohrmann < > > > trohrm...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> I think we have a history of creating too long monolithic > > > > > documentation > > > > > > >> pages which are hard to digest. So a big +1 for splitting the > > > Table > > > > > > API/SQL > > > > > > >> documentation up into more easily digestible pieces. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for bringing it up > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
