Thanks, Aljoscha :) So is it possible to continue to use the new "native' fllesystems along with the BucketingSink by including the Hadoop dependencies only in the user's uber jar? Or is that asking for trouble? Has anyone tried that successfully?
-Jamie On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm afraid not, since the BucketingSink uses the Hadoop FileSystem > directly and not the Flink FileSystem abstraction. The flink-s3-fs-* > modules only provide Flink FileSystems. > > One of the goals for 1.6 is to provide a BucketingSink that uses the Flink > FileSystem and also works well with eventually consistent file systems. > > -- > Aljoscha > > > On 23. Feb 2018, at 06:31, Jamie Grier <jgr...@lyft.com> wrote: > > > > Is the `flink-connector-filesystem` connector supposed to work with the > > latest hadoop-free Flink releases, say along with the > `flink-s3-fs-presto` > > filesystem implementation? > > > > -Jamie > >