Hi,

I'm planning to put the reworked website online next week.
You can have a look at PR #109 [1] to check the changes and give feedback.

Btw. I've created FLINK-9541 to track the effort of adding a sitemap.xml.

Cheers,
Fabian

[1] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/109
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9541


2018-06-06 12:57 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>:

> Thanks for the feedback so far.
>
> +1 for adding a sitemap.xml and robots.txt to the website.
>
> I think we can make this a separate issue. I'll create a JIRA for that.
>
> Any other thoughts or feedback?
>
> Thanks, Fabian
>
> 2018-06-06 9:34 GMT+02:00 Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>:
>
>> Yes, making sure that google search results point to the most recent doc
>> would be very good. :+1
>>
>> Also +1 to the general effort, of course.
>>
>> > On 5. Jun 2018, at 20:19, Ken Krugler <kkrugler_li...@transpac.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Along these lines, it would help to add a sitemap (and the robots.txt
>> required to reference it) for flink.apache.org and ci.apache.org (for
>> /projects/flink)
>> >
>> > You can see what Tomcat did along these lines -
>> http://tomcat.apache.org/robots.txt references
>> http://tomcat.apache.org/sitemap.xml, which is a sitemap index file
>> pointing to http://tomcat.apache.org/sitemap-main.xml
>> >
>> > By doing this, you can emphasize more recent versions of docs. There
>> are other benefits, but reducing poor Google search results (to me) is the
>> biggest win.
>> >
>> > E.g.  https://www.google.com/search?q=flink+reducingstate <
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=flink+reducingstate> (search on flink
>> reducing state) shows the 1.3 Javadocs (hit #1), master (1.6-SNAPSHOT)
>> Javadocs (hit #2), and then many pages of other results.
>> >
>> > Whereas the Javadocs for 1.5 <https://ci.apache.org/project
>> s/flink/flink-docs-release-1.5/api/java/org/apache/flink/
>> api/common/state/ReducingState.html> and 1.4 <
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.
>> 4/api/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/state/ReducingState.html> are
>> nowhere to be found.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > — Ken
>> >
>> >> On Jun 5, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Big +1 to this!
>> >>
>> >> I would like to contribute to this effort and help strengthen the way
>> Flink
>> >> presents itself.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi everybody,
>> >>>
>> >>> I've opened a PR [1] that reworks parts of the Flink website (
>> >>> flink.apache.org).
>> >>>
>> >>> My goal is to improve the structure of the website and provide more
>> >>> valuable information about the project and the community.
>> >>>
>> >>> A visitor (who doesn't know Flink yet) should be able to easily find
>> >>> answers to the following questions:
>> >>> * What is Apache Flink?
>> >>> * Does it address my use case?
>> >>> * Is it credible? / Who is using it?
>> >>>
>> >>> To achieve that, I have:
>> >>> * Rework menu structure into three sections to address different
>> audiences:
>> >>> - Potential users (see above)
>> >>> - Users
>> >>> - Contributors
>> >>> * Reworked start page: updated the figure, added a feature grid, moved
>> >>> "Powered By" section up
>> >>> * Replaced Features page by more detailed "What is Flink?" pages
>> >>> * Reworked "Use Cases" page
>> >>>
>> >>> The PR should also improve the page for users who have questions about
>> >>> Flink or need help.
>> >>> For that, I have:
>> >>> * Added a "Getting Help" page (less content than the detailed
>> community
>> >>> page)
>> >>> * Removed IRC channel info
>> >>>
>> >>> Please give feedback, suggest improvements, and proof read the new
>> texts.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks, Fabian
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/109
>> >>>
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------
>> > http://about.me/kkrugler
>> > +1 530-210-6378
>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to