What would this timing mean for the epic around state schema evolution and state migration?
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:43 AM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@data-artisans.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think that’s a good time for the release, will give us some time before > holidays season for potential bug fixes. > > Piotrek > > > On 29 Sep 2018, at 05:08, Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Please prioritize a proper long-term fix for this issue. it is a big > > scalability issue for high-parallelism job (e.g. over 1,000). > > > > FLINK-10122 KafkaConsumer should use partitionable state over union state > > if partition discovery is not active > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:20 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> Dear community, > >> > >> almost 2 months have passed since the Flink 1.6 release and some good > >> features for the next major release are close to completion. Therefore, > I > >> would like to discuss a possible feature freeze for Flink 1.7. > >> > >> Given that we've released Flink 1.6 at the beginning of August, I would > >> like to aim for the end of October beginning of November for the 1.7 > >> release date. In order to have enough time for release testing, I would > >> therefore propose the 22nd of October as the feature freeze deadline. > >> > >> What do you think about this date (realistic, too early, too late) and > >> which features/issues do you think should get priority? > >> > >> Since every release needs a release manager, I would also volunteer for > it. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Till > >> > > -- *David Anderson* | Training Coordinator | data Artisans -- Join Flink Forward - The Apache Flink Conference Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
