Thanks a lot for the quick response!
I will consider the Flink Accepted and will start working on it.
Cheers,
Kostas
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:29 AM SHI Xiaogang <shixiaoga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Glad that programming with flink becomes simpler and easier.
>
> Regards,
> Xiaogang
>
> Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> 于2019年8月14日周三 下午11:31写道：
>
> > +1 (for the same reasons I posted on the other thread)
> >
> > > On 14. Aug 2019, at 15:03, Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > It could be regarded as part of Flink client api refactor.
> > > Removal of stale code paths helps reason refactor.
> > >
> > > There is one thing worth attention that in this thread[1] Thomas
> > > suggests an interface with a method return JobGraph based on the
> > > fact that REST API and in per job mode actually extracts the JobGraph
> > > from user program and submit it instead of running user program and
> > > submission happens inside the program in session scenario.
> > >
> > > Such an interface would be like
> > >
> > > interface Program {
> > > JobGraph getJobGraph(args);
> > > }
> > >
> > > Anyway, the discussion above could be continued in that thread.
> > > Current Program is a legacy class that quite less useful than it should
> > be.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > tison.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/REST-API-JarRunHandler-More-flexibility-for-launching-jobs-td31026.html#a31168
> > >
> > >
> > > Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> 于2019年8月14日周三 下午7:50写道：
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> the "main" method is the overwhelming default. getting rid of "two ways
> > to
> > >> do things" is a good idea.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:42 PM Kostas Kloudas <kklou...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> As discussed in [1] , the Program interface seems to be outdated and
> > >>> there seems to be
> > >>> no objection to remove it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Given that this interface is PublicEvolving, its removal should pass
> > >>> through a FLIP and
> > >>> this discussion and the associated FLIP are exactly for that purpose.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please let me know what you think and if it is ok to proceed with its
> > >>> removal.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Kostas
> > >>>
> > >>> link to FLIP-52 :
> > >>>
> > >>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=125308637
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > >>>
> > >>
> > https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/7ffc9936a384b891dbcf0a481d26c6d13b2125607c200577780d1e18@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
