AFAIK this voting scheme is described in the "Modifying Bylaws" section, in the end introducing bylaws is a modify operation ;) . I think it is a valid point to CC priv...@flink.apache.org in the future. I wouldn't say it is a must though. The voting scheme requires that every PMC member has to be reached out directly, via a private address if he/she did not vote in a thread. So every PMC member should be aware of the voting thread.
Best, Dawid On 16/08/2019 12:38, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > I'm very late to the party, but isn't it a bit weird that we're using > a voting scheme that isn't laid out in the bylaws? > > Additionally, I would heavily suggest to CC priv...@flink.apache.org, > as we want as many PMC as possible to look at this. > (I would regard the this point as a reason for delaying the vote > conclusion) > > On 11/08/2019 10:07, Becket Qin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to start a voting thread on the project bylaws of Flink. It >> aims to help the community coordinate more smoothly. Please see the >> bylaws >> wiki page below for details. >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026 >> >> >> The discussion thread is following: >> >> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Flink-project-bylaws-td30409.html >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 6 days. PMC members' votes are >> considered as binding. The vote requires 2/3 majority of the binding >> +1s to >> pass. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
