Thanks for starting this design Timo and Dawid, Improving ConfigOption has been hovering in my mind for a long time. We have seen the benefit when developing blink configurations and connector properties in 1.9 release. Thanks for bringing it up and make such a detailed design. I will leave my thoughts and comments there.
Cheers, Jark On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 22:30, Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Timo, > > It looks interesting. Thanks for preparing this FLIP! > > Client API enhancement benefit from this evolution which > hopefully provides a better view of configuration of Flink. > In client API enhancement, we likely make the deployment > of cluster and submission of job totally defined by configuration. > > Will take a look at the document in days. > > Best, > tison. > > > Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> 于2019年8月16日周五 下午10:12写道： > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Dawid and I are working on making parts of ExecutionConfig and > > TableConfig configurable via config options. This is necessary to make > > all properties also available in SQL. Additionally, with the new SQL DDL > > based on properties as well as more connectors and formats coming up, > > unified configuration becomes more important. > > > > We need more features around string-based configuration in the future, > > which is why Dawid and I would like to propose FLIP-54 for evolving the > > ConfigOption and Configuration classes: > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IQ7nwXqmhCy900t2vQLEL3N2HIdMg-JO8vTzo1BtyKU/edit > > > > In summary it adds: > > - documented types and validation > > - more common types such as memory size, duration, list > > - simple non-nested object types > > > > Looking forward to your feedback, > > Timo > > > > >
