@Zili As far as I know, Timo is drafting a FLIP that has taken the number 55. There is a round-up number maintained on the FLIP wiki page [1] shows which number should be used for the new FLIP, which should be increased by whoever takes the number for a new FLIP.
Thank you~ Xintong Song [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 3:28 AM Zili Chen <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote: > We suddenly skipped FLIP-55 lol. > > > Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月19日周一 下午10:23写道： > > > Hi everyone, > > > > We would like to start a discussion thread on "FLIP-56: Dynamic Slot > > Allocation" [1]. This is originally part of the discussion thread for > > "FLIP-53: Fine Grained Resource Management" [2]. As Till suggested, we > > would like split the original discussion into two topics, and start a > > separate new discussion thread as well as FLIP process for this one. > > > > Thank you~ > > > > Xintong Song > > > > > > [1] > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-56%3A+Dynamic+Slot+Allocation > > > > [2] > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-53-Fine-Grained-Resource-Management-td31831.html > > >
