Since one week passed and no more comments, I assume the latest FLIP doc
looks good to all and will open a VOTE thread soon for the FLIP. Thanks for
all the comments and discussion!

Best Regards,
Yu


On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 18:35, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the comments Biao!
>
> bq. It seems this proposal is separated into several stages. Is there a
> more detailed plan?
> Good point! For stage one we'd like to try introducing the benchmark
> first, so we could guard the release (hopefully starting from 1.10). For
> other stages, we don't have detailed plan yet, but will add child FLIPs
> when moving on and open new discussion/voting separately. I have updated
> the FLIP document to better reflect this, please check it and let me know
> what you think. Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 10:16, Biao Liu <mmyy1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Yu for bringing this topic.
>>
>> +1 for this proposal. Glad to have an e2e performance testing.
>>
>> It seems this proposal is separated into several stages. Is there a more
>> detailed plan?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Biao /'bɪ.aʊ/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 19:54, Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for this idea.
>> >
>> > Currently, we have the micro benchmark for flink, which can help us find
>> > the regressions. And I think the e2e jobs performance testing can also
>> help
>> > us to cover more scenarios.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Congxian
>> >
>> >
>> > Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月4日周一 下午5:37写道:
>> >
>> > > +1 for the idea. Thanks Yu for driving this.
>> > > Just curious about that can we collect the metrics about Job
>> scheduling
>> > and
>> > > task launch. the speed of this part is also important.
>> > > We can add tests for watch it too.
>> > >
>> > > Look forward to more batch test support.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Jingsong Lee
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:00 AM OpenInx <open...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > > The test cases are written in java and scripts in python. We
>> propose
>> > a
>> > > > separate directory/module in parallel with flink-end-to-end-tests,
>> with
>> > > the
>> > > > > name of flink-end-to-end-perf-tests.
>> > > >
>> > > > Glad to see that the newly introduced e2e test will be written in
>> Java.
>> > > > because  I'm re-working on the existed e2e tests suites from BASH
>> > scripts
>> > > > to Java test cases so that we can support more external system ,
>> such
>> > as
>> > > > running the testing job on yarn+flink, docker+flink,
>> standalone+flink,
>> > > > distributed kafka cluster etc.
>> > > > BTW, I think the perf e2e test suites will also need to be designed
>> as
>> > > > supporting running on both standalone env and distributed env. will
>> be
>> > > > helpful
>> > > > for developing & evaluating the perf.
>> > > > Thanks.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 9:31 AM aihua li <liaihua1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > In stage1, the checkpoint mode isn't disabled,and uses heap as the
>> > > > > statebackend.
>> > > > > I think there should be some special scenarios to test checkpoint
>> and
>> > > > > statebackend, which will be discussed and added in the
>> release-1.11
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > 在 2019年11月2日,上午12:13,Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 写道:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > By the way, do you think it's worthy to add a checkpoint mode
>> which
>> > > > just
>> > > > > disable checkpoint to run end-to-end jobs? And when will stage2
>> and
>> > > > stage3
>> > > > > be discussed in more details?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Best, Jingsong Lee
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to