Hi Chesnay,

Thanks a lot for kicking off this release. +1 to release flink-shaded 9.0.

I'm willing to help on the release. Please feel free to let me know
if there is anything I could help.

Regards,
Dian

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:43 PM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:

> @Chesnay: I know you said that you are pretty busy these days. If we can't
> find anybody else to work on this, when would you be available to create
> the first RC?
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 6:48 AM Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Big +1 to release 9.0.
> > It would be good if we can solve these security vulnerabilities.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your nice work and kick off the release so quickly.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > From what I can see, the Jackson version bump fixes quite a few
> > > vulnerabilities. Therefore, I'd be +1 to release flink-shaded 9.0.
> > >
> > > Thanks for all the work to verify this on master already.
> > >
> > > – Ufuk
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:26 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to kick off the next release for flink-shaded. Background is
> > > > that we recently bumped jackson to 2.10.1 to fix a variety of
> security
> > > > vulnerabilities, and it would be good to include them in the upcoming
> > > > 1.8.3/1.9.2 releases.
> > > >
> > > > The release would contain few changes beyond the jackson changes;
> > > > flink-shaded can now be compiled on Java 11 and an encoding issue for
> > > > the NOTICE files was fixed.
> > > >
> > > > So overall this should be very little overhead.
> > > >
> > > > I have already verified that the master would work with this version
> > > > (this being a reasonable indicator for it also working in previous
> > > > version).
> > > >
> > > > I'd also appreciate it if someone would volunteer to handle the
> > release;
> > > > I'm quite bogged down at the moment :(
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Chesnay
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to