+1 (binding)

Best,
Gary

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:55 AM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Yu for this proposal.
> +1(non-binding) for the overall design.
>
> I have 2 questions about the result check though. Posted in the discussion
> ML thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu Zhu
>
> Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> 于2019年11月21日周四 上午11:57写道:
>
> > Hi Yu,
> >
> > Thanks for updating the FLIP wiki. +1 from me. I do not have further
> > questions.
> >
> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 8:58 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks all for the vote and further discussions.
> > >
> > > I have updated the FLIP document according to aihua's reply (with some
> > > minor refinement/supplements). For your convenience, below are the
> > contents
> > > I added:
> > > *====================================*
> > >
> > > *There're also other dimensions other than Flink characteristics,
> > > including:*
> > >
> > >    - *Record size: to check both the processing (records/s) and data
> > >    (bytes/s) throughput, we will test the 10B, 100B and 1KB record size
> > for
> > >    each test job.*
> > >    - *Resource for each task: we will use the Flink default settings to
> > >    cover the most used cases.*
> > >    - *Job Parallelism: we will increase the parallelism to saturate the
> > >    system until back-pressure.*
> > >    - *Source and Sink: to focus on Flink performance, we generate the
> > >    source data randomly and use a blackhole consumer as the sink.*
> > >
> > > *====================================*
> > >
> > > @becket.qin <becket....@gmail.com> please let us know if the updates
> > look
> > > good to you to turn your voting to a complete binding +1, or if any
> more
> > > concerns/comments. Thanks!
> > >
> > > @voters: please also take a look at the updates and let us know if any
> > new
> > > comments. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Yu
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 11:10, aihua li <liaihua1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> hi,Becket,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the comments!
> > >>
> > >> > 1. How do the testing records look like? The size and key
> > distributions.
> > >>
> > >> The records looks like a long string,which default size is 1k. The key
> > is
> > >> randomly generated according to the specified range plus a fixed
> string
> > to
> > >> assure that the data is evenly distributed on each task.
> > >>
> > >> > 2. The resources for each task.
> > >>
> > >> The resources for each task used the default value.
> > >>
> > >> > 3. The intended configuration for the jobs.
> > >>
> > >> The parallelism of test Job will be adjusted according to resource
> > >> conditions to fill the cluster as much as possible. Other
> configurations
> > >> are not supported at this time.
> > >>
> > >> > 4. What exact source and sink it would use.
> > >>
> > >> In order to reduce the dependence on the external, the source data is
> > >> generated randomly, the sink only supports hdfs or no sinks.
> > >>
> > >> we will add this details to the flip laterly.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > 在 2019年11月18日,下午7:59,Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> 写道:
> > >> >
> > >> > +1 (binding) on having the test suite.
> > >> >
> > >> > BTW, it would be good to have a few more details about the
> performance
> > >> > tests. For example:
> > >> > 1. How do the testing records look like? The size and key
> > distributions.
> > >> > 2. The resources for each task.
> > >> > 3. The intended configuration for the jobs.
> > >> > 4. What exact source and sink it would use.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> >
> > >> > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 7:25 PM Zhijiang <
> wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com
> > >> .invalid>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> +1 (binding)!
> > >> >>
> > >> >> It is a good thing to enhance our testing work.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Best,
> > >> >> Zhijiang
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> From:Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com>
> > >> >> Send Time:2019 Nov. 18 (Mon.) 18:22
> > >> >> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > >> >> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-83: Flink End-to-end Performance Testing
> > >> Framework
> > >> >>
> > >> >> +1 (binding)!
> > >> >> I think this would be very helpful to detect regression problems.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Best, Hequn
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:28 PM vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Best,
> > >> >>> Vino
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月18日周一 下午2:31写道:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> +1  (binding)
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> OpenInx <open...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月18日周一 下午12:09写道:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>> +1  (non-binding)
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:54 AM aihua li <
> liaihua1...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> +1  (non-binding)
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Thanks Yu Li for driving on this.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> 在 2019年11月15日,下午8:10,Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Hi All,
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-83 [1] which is
> > discussed
> > >> >>> and
> > >> >>>>>>> reached consensus in the discussion thread [2].
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (excluding
> weekend).
> > >> >>> I'll
> > >> >>>>> try
> > >> >>>>>>> to close it by 2019-11-20 21:00 CST, unless there is an
> > objection
> > >> >>> or
> > >> >>>>> not
> > >> >>>>>>> enough votes.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> [1]
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-83%3A+Flink+End-to-end+Performance+Testing+Framework
> > >> >>>>>>> [2] https://s.apache.org/7fqrz
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >> >>>>>>> Yu
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to