Sounds like something we could do in 1.11 then, as part of simplification / cleanup
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:18 AM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 from my side. > > FWIW, shall we also include @user ML into this discussion? > > Best Regards, > Yu > > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 15:11, Congxian Qiu <qcx978132...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 from my side. > > > > Best, > > Congxian > > > > > > Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 于2019年12月6日周五 下午12:30写道： > > > > > +1 from my side for I did not see any real benefits if using > synchronous > > > snapshots. > > > > > > Moreover, I think we should also remove the support of synchronous > > > snapshots in DefaultOpeatorStateBackend and deprecate the config > > > state.backend.async > > > > > > Best > > > Yun Tang > > > > > > On 12/5/19, 8:06 PM, "Stephan Ewen" <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > I am wondering if there is any case for retaining the option to > make > > > synchronous snapshots on the heap statebackend. Is anyone using > that? > > > Or > > > could we clean that code up and remove it? > > > > > > Best, > > > Stephan > > > > > > > > > > > >
