hi Flavio, TableEnvironment.getCompletionHints maybe already meet the
requirement.

Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it> 于2020年1月18日周六 下午3:39写道:

> Why not adding also a suggest() method (also unimplemented initially) that
> would return the list of suitable completions/tokens on the current query?
> How complex eould it be to implement it in you opinion?
>
> Il Ven 17 Gen 2020, 18:32 Fabian Hueske (Jira) <j...@apache.org> ha
> scritto:
>
> > Fabian Hueske created FLINK-15644:
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> >              Summary: Add support for SQL query validation
> >                  Key: FLINK-15644
> >                  URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15644
> >              Project: Flink
> >           Issue Type: New Feature
> >           Components: Table SQL / API
> >             Reporter: Fabian Hueske
> >
> >
> > It would be good if the {{TableEnvironment}} would offer methods to check
> > the validity of SQL queries. Such a method could be used by services (CLI
> > query shells, notebooks, SQL UIs) that are backed by Flink and execute
> > their queries on Flink.
> >
> > Validation should be available in two levels:
> >  # Validation of syntax and semantics: This includes parsing the query,
> > checking the catalog for dbs, tables, fields, type checks for expressions
> > and functions, etc. This will check if the query is a valid SQL query.
> >  # Validation that query is supported: Checks if Flink can execute the
> > given query. Some syntactically and semantically valid SQL queries are
> not
> > supported, esp. in a streaming context. This requires running the
> > optimizer. If the optimizer generates an execution plan, the query can be
> > executed. This check includes the first step and is more expensive.
> >
> > The reason for this separation is that the first check can be done much
> > fast as it does not involve calling the optimizer. Hence, it would be
> > suitable for fast checks in an interactive query editor. The second check
> > might take more time (depending on the complexity of the query) and might
> > not be suitable for rapid checks but only on explicit user request.
> >
> > Requirements:
> >  * validation does not modify the state of the {{TableEnvironment}}, i.e.
> > it does not add plan operators
> >  * validation does not require connector dependencies
> >  * validation can identify the update mode of a continuous query result
> > (append-only, upsert, retraction).
> >
> > Out of scope for this issue:
> >  * better error messages for unsupported features as suggested by
> > FLINK-7217
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
> > (v8.3.4#803005)
> >
>

Reply via email to