Hi Hequn,

Given this is an addition to the public API, we probably should follow the
FLIP process. It would be a quick one though, I think.

Thanks,

Jiangjie (Becket) Qin

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:03 AM Hequn Cheng <he...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thanks a lot for your valuable feedback!
> As it seems we have reached a consensus on the discussion now. I have
> started a VOTE thread[1]. Looking forward to your vote.
>
> Best,
> Hequn
>
> [1]
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Support-Python-ML-Pipeline-API-td37637.html
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:40 AM Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1. I'd say this is almost a must-have for machine learning.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:03 AM Rong Rong <walter...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for driving this initiative @Hequn Cheng <he...@apache.org>.
>>>
>>> Moving towards python based ML is definitely a huge win consider how
>>> large
>>> the python-ML community is. a big +1 on my side!
>>> Regarding the doc, I only left a few comments on the specific APIs.
>>> overall
>>> the architecture looks very good!
>>>
>>> Looking forward to it!
>>> --
>>> Rong
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 10:28 PM Hequn Cheng <he...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks a lot for your feedback. I have created the FLIP[1].
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> > Hequn
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP+96%3A+Support+Python+ML+Pipeline+API
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:29 PM Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Hequn,
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks for bringing up the discussion. +1 to this feature. The design
>>> > LGTM.
>>> > > It's great that the Python ML users could use both the Java Pipeline
>>> > > Transformer/Estimator/Model classes and the Python
>>> > > Pipeline Transformer/Estimator/Model in the same job.
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > > Dian
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:08 AM jincheng sun <
>>> sunjincheng...@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi Hequn,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks for bring up this discussion.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > +1 for add Python ML Pipeline API, even though the Java pipeline
>>> API
>>> > may
>>> > > > change.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I would like to suggest create a FLIP for this API changes. :)
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Best,
>>> > > > Jincheng
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Hequn Cheng <he...@apache.org> 于2020年2月5日周三 下午5:24写道:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Hi everyone,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > FLIP-39[1] rebuilds the Flink ML pipeline on top of TableAPI and
>>> > > > introduces
>>> > > > > a new set of Java APIs. As Python is widely used in ML areas,
>>> > providing
>>> > > > > Python ML Pipeline APIs for Flink can not only make it easier to
>>> > write
>>> > > ML
>>> > > > > jobs for Python users but also broaden the adoption of Flink ML.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Given this, Jincheng and I discussed offline about the support of
>>> > > Python
>>> > > > ML
>>> > > > > Pipeline API and drafted a design doc[2]. We'd like to achieve
>>> three
>>> > > > goals
>>> > > > > for supporting Python Pipeline API:
>>> > > > > - Add Python pipeline API according to Java pipeline API(we will
>>> > adapt
>>> > > > the
>>> > > > > Python pipeline API if Java pipeline API changes).
>>> > > > > - Support native Python Transformer/Estimator/Model, i.e., users
>>> can
>>> > > > write
>>> > > > > not only Python Transformer/Estimator/Model wrappers for calling
>>> Java
>>> > > > ones
>>> > > > > but also can write native Python Transformer/Estimator/Models.
>>> > > > > - Ease of use. Support keyword arguments when defining
>>> parameters.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > More details can be found in the design doc and we are looking
>>> > forward
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > your feedback.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Best,
>>> > > > > Hequn
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > [1]
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-39+Flink+ML+pipeline+and+ML+libs
>>> > > > > [2]
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fwSO5sRNWMoYuvNgfQJUV6N2n2q5UEVA4sezCljKcVQ/edit?usp=sharing
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to