Hi

+1 to drop bucketing sink
FLIP-115 also needs to be prioritized for 1.11

在 2020/3/13 上午10:07,“Jingsong Li”<jingsongl...@gmail.com> 写入:

    Hi Robert,
    
    +1 to drop it but maybe not 1.11.
    
    ORC has not been supported on StreamingFileSink. I have seen lots of users
    run ORC in the bucketing sink.
    
    Best,
    Jingsong Lee
    
    On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:11 AM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> wrote:
    
    > Sorry, I meant FLIP-46.
    >
    > Seth
    >
    > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:52 AM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > > I agree with David, I think FLIP-49 needs to be prioritized for 1.11 if
    > we
    > > want to drop the bucketing sink.
    > >
    > > Seth
    > >
    > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:53 AM David Anderson <da...@ververica.com>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > >> The BucketingSink is still somewhat widely used, I think in part 
because
    > >> of
    > >> shortcomings in the StreamingFileSink.
    > >>
    > >> I would hope that in tandem with removing the bucketing sink we could
    > also
    > >> address some of these issues. I'm thinking in particular of issues that
    > >> are
    > >> waiting on FLIP-46 [1].
    > >>
    > >> Removing the bucketing sink will go down better, in my opinion, if it's
    > >> coupled with progress on some of the open StreamingFileSink tickets.
    > >>
    > >> Best,
    > >> David
    > >>
    > >> [1]
    > >>
    > >>
    > 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-46%3A+Graceful+Shutdown+Handling+by+UDFs
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 4:27 PM Zhijiang <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com
    > >> .invalid>
    > >> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> > Thanks for driving this discussion, Robert!
    > >> >
    > >> > This e2e test really fails frequently.  +1 to drop bucketing sink, it
    > is
    > >> > not worth paying more efforts since deprecated.
    > >> >
    > >> > Best,
    > >> > Zhijiang
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >> > From:Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>
    > >> > Send Time:2020 Mar. 12 (Thu.) 23:17
    > >> > To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
    > >> > Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Bucketing Sink
    > >> >
    > >> > +1, dropping deprecated api is always necessary for a sustainable
    > >> project.
    > >> >
    > >> > Kostas Kloudas <kklou...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月12日周四 下午11:06写道:
    > >> >
    > >> > > Hi Robert,
    > >> > >
    > >> > > +1 for dropping the BucketingSink.
    > >> > > In any case, it has not been maintained for quite some time.
    > >> > >
    > >> > > Cheers,
    > >> > > Kostas
    > >> > >
    > >> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:41 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org
    > >
    > >> > > wrote:
    > >> > > >
    > >> > > > Hi all,
    > >> > > >
    > >> > > > I'm currently investigating a failing end to end test for the
    > >> bucketing
    > >> > > > sink [1].
    > >> > > > The bucketing sink has been deprecated in the 1.9 release [2],
    > >> because
    > >> > we
    > >> > > > have the new StreamingFileSink [3] for quite a while.
    > >> > > > Before putting any effort into fixing the end to end test for the
    > >> > sink, I
    > >> > > > wanted to propose dropping the bucketing sink from master for the
    > >> > > upcoming
    > >> > > > 1.11 release.
    > >> > > >
    > >> > > > What do you think?
    > >> > > >
    > >> > > >
    > >> > > >
    > >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16227
    > >> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13396
    > >> > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9749
    > >> > >
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> > --
    > >> > Best Regards
    > >> >
    > >> > Jeff Zhang
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >
    >
    
    
    -- 
    Best, Jingsong Lee
    


Reply via email to