Hi everyone,

Thanks all for the votes.
So far, we have

   - 3 binding +1 votes (Timo, Kurt, Dawid)
   - 1 non-binding +1 votes (Terry)
   - No -1 votes

The voting time has past and there is enough +1 votes to consider the FLIP-84
approved.
Thank you all.


Best,
Godfrey

Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org> 于2020年4月7日周二 下午2:29写道:

> +1
>
> Best,
>
> Dawid
>
> On 07/04/2020 07:44, godfrey he wrote:
> > Hi, Kurt
> >
> > yes. `TableEnvironement#executeSql` also could execute `SELECT`
> statement,
> > which is similar to `Table#execute`.
> > I add this to the document.
> >
> > Best,
> > Godfrey
> >
> > Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 于2020年4月7日周二 上午11:52写道:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> The latest doc looks good to me. One minor comment is with the latest
> >> changes, it seems also very easy
> >> to support running SELECT query in TableEnvironement#executeSql method.
> >> Will this also be supported?
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Kurt
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:49 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks, for the update.
> >>>
> >>> +1 (binding) for this FLIP
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Timo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 06.04.20 16:47, godfrey he wrote:
> >>>> Hi Timo,
> >>>>
> >>>> Sorry for late reply, and thanks for your correction. I have fixed the
> >>> typo
> >>>> and updated the document.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Godfrey
> >>>>
> >>>> Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> 于2020年4月6日周一 下午6:05写道:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Godfrey,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> did you see my remaining feedback in the discussion thread? We could
> >>>>> finish this FLIP if this gets resolved.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Timo
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 03.04.20 15:12, Terry Wang wrote:
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>> Looks great to me, Thanks for driving on this.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>> Terry Wang
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2020年4月3日 21:07,godfrey he <godfre...@gmail.com> 写道:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'd like to start the vote of FLIP-84[1] again, which is discussed
> >> and
> >>>>>>> reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there is an
> >>>>> objection,
> >>>>>>> I will try to close it by Apr 6, 2020 13:10 UTC if we have received
> >>>>>>> sufficient votes.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=134745878
> >>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-84-Feedback-Summary-td39261.html
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Bests,
> >>>>>>> Godfrey
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> godfrey he <godfre...@gmail.com> 于2020年3月31日周二 下午8:42写道:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi, Timo
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So sorry about that, I'm in a little hurry. Let's wait for 24h.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> Godfrey
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> 于2020年3月31日周二 下午5:26写道:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The current discussion has not completed. The last comments were
> >>> sent
> >>>>>>>>> less than 24h ago.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Let's wait a bit longer to collect feedback from all
> stakeholders.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Timo
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 31.03.20 08:31, godfrey he wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to start the vote of FLIP-84[1] again, because we have
> >>> some
> >>>>>>>>>> feedbacks. The feedbacks are all about new introduced methods,
> >> here
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> discussion thread [2].
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there is an
> >>>>>>>>> objection,
> >>>>>>>>>> I will try to close it by Apr 3, 2020 06:30 UTC if we have
> >> received
> >>>>>>>>>> sufficient votes.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=134745878
> >>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-FLIP-84-Feedback-Summary-td39261.html
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Bests,
> >>>>>>>>>> Godfrey
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
>
>

Reply via email to