Thanks a lot for driving this, Yu!
Some users are already asking "where to download release-1.10.1?"
Looking forward to the rc.

Best,
Godfrey

Hequn Cheng <he...@apache.org> 于2020年4月16日周四 下午12:45写道:

> Thanks a lot for your great work Yu! Looking forward to the RC.
>
> Best, Hequn
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:35 AM Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot for driving this, Yu! Looking forward for the first RC of
> > 1.10.1.
> >
> > > 在 2020年4月16日,上午10:24,jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > >
> > > Looking forward the first RC of Flink 1.10.1 .
> > > Good  job Yu!
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Jincheng
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2020年4月15日周三 下午6:28写道:
> > >
> > >> +1 to have a 1.10.1 RC soon. It has been a long time since 1.10.0 is
> > >> released.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Jark
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 16:10, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Great to see that will have the first RC for Flink 1.10.1 soon.
> Thanks
> > a
> > >>> lot for driving this effort Yu!
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Till
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 5:03 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Thanks Weike and all others for the efforts!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Here comes the latest status, we are in good shape and plan to
> produce
> > >>> RC1
> > >>>> next week.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * Blockers (1 left)
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting when submitting
> batch
> > >>> job
> > >>>> (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace OOM error on
> > >>> repeated
> > >>>> job submission
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest ClassNotFoundException
> > >>> when
> > >>>> use flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > >>>> FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace to
> > >>>> minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE files
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16705 LocalExecutor tears down MiniCluster before
> > >>> client
> > >>>> can retrieve JobResult
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16913 ReadableConfigToConfigurationAdapter#getEnum
> > >>>> throws UnsupportedOperationException
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16626 Exception encountered when cancelling a job
> in
> > >>>> yarn per-job mode
> > >>>>  - [Fix for 1.10.1 is Done] FLINK-17093 Python UDF doesn't work when
> > >> the
> > >>>> input column is of composite type
> > >>>>  - [PR reviewed] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with
> > >> memory
> > >>>> state backends
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * Critical (1 left)
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate
> results
> > >>>> with state clean up
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract correct unique
> > >> key
> > >>>> for UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >>>>  - [Fix for 1.10.1 is Done] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory
> should
> > >>> be
> > >>>> handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> > >>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-14316 stuck in "Job leader ... lost leadership"
> > >> error
> > >>>>  - [May Postpone] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to
> lifetime
> > >>> of a
> > >>>> slot
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please let me know if any concerns/comments. Thanks.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>> Yu
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 21:35, DONG, Weike <kyled...@connect.hku.hk>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Yu,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks for your updates. I am still working on the fix for
> > >> FLINK-16626
> > >>>> and
> > >>>>> it is expected to be completed by this Sunday after thorough
> testing.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Sincerely,
> > >>>>> Weike
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 8:43 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Updates for 1.10.1 watched issues (we are in good progress and
> > >> almost
> > >>>>>> there
> > >>>>>> to produce the first RC, thanks all for the efforts):
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> * Blockers (3 left)
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting when submitting
> > >> batch
> > >>>> job
> > >>>>>> (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace OOM error on
> > >>>>>> repeated
> > >>>>>> job submission
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest
> > >> ClassNotFoundException
> > >>>> when
> > >>>>>> use flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > >>>>>> FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace
> to
> > >>>>>> minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE files
> > >>>>>>  - [PR reviewed] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with
> > >>> memory
> > >>>>>> state backends
> > >>>>>>  - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16626 Exception encountered when
> > >>>> cancelling a
> > >>>>>> job in yarn per-job mode
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16705 LocalExecutor tears down MiniCluster
> before
> > >>>>>> client
> > >>>>>> can retrieve JobResult
> > >>>>>>  - [PR reviewed] FLINK-16913
> > >>>> ReadableConfigToConfigurationAdapter#getEnum
> > >>>>>> throws UnsupportedOperationException
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> * Critical (1 left)
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-14316 stuck in "Job leader ... lost leadership"
> > >>> error
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate
> > >>> results
> > >>>>>> with state clean up
> > >>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract correct
> > >> unique
> > >>>> key
> > >>>>>> for UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >>>>>>  - [Fix for 1.10.1 is Done] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory
> > >>> should
> > >>>> be
> > >>>>>> handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> > >>>>>>  - [May Postpone] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to
> > >> lifetime
> > >>>> of
> > >>>>>> a
> > >>>>>> slot
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Please let me know if you find any missing ones, thanks.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 21:06, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Here comes the latest status of issues in 1.10.1 watch list:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> * Blockers (4 left)
> > >>>>>>>  - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting when
> > >>>>>> submitting
> > >>>>>>> batch job (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> > >>>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace OOM error on
> > >>>>>>> repeated job submission
> > >>>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest
> > >>> ClassNotFoundException
> > >>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>> use flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >>>>>>>  - [PR Approved] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > >>>>>>> FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory
> > >>>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace
> > >> to
> > >>>>>>> minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> > >>>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE files
> > >>>>>>>  - [In Progress] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with
> > >>>> memory
> > >>>>>>> state backends
> > >>>>>>>  - [New] [PR Submitted] FLINK-16705 LocalExecutor tears down
> > >>>>>> MiniCluster
> > >>>>>>> before client can retrieve JobResult
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> * Critical (2 left)
> > >>>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate
> > >>>> results
> > >>>>>>> with state clean up
> > >>>>>>>  - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract
> > >> correct
> > >>>>>>> unique key for UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >>>>>>>  - [Fix for 1.10.1 Done] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory
> > >> should
> > >>>> be
> > >>>>>>> handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> > >>>>>>>  - [Open] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to lifetime of
> > >> a
> > >>>> slot
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> There's a new blocker added. Please let me know if you find any
> > >>> other
> > >>>>>>> issues should be put into the watch list. Thanks.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 14:37, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Here is the status update of issues in 1.10.1 watch list:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> * Blockers (7)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting when
> > >>>>>>>> submitting batch job (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes Metaspace
> > >> OOM
> > >>>>>> error
> > >>>>>>>> on repeated job submission
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest
> > >>>>>>>> ClassNotFoundException when use
> > >> flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > >>>>>>>> FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib directory
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM Metaspace
> > >>> to
> > >>>>>>>> minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE
> > >> files
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [Open] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with memory
> > >>>> state
> > >>>>>>>> backends
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> * Critical (4)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong aggregate
> > >>>> results
> > >>>>>>>> with state clean up
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not extract
> > >>> correct
> > >>>>>>>> unique key for UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory should
> > >>> be
> > >>>>>>>> handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>  - [Open] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to lifetime
> > >> of a
> > >>>>>> slot
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Please let me know if you see any new blockers to add to the
> > >> list.
> > >>>>>> Thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 00:11, Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the updates Till!
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> For FLINK-16018, maybe we could create two sub-tasks for easy
> > >> and
> > >>>>>>>>> complete fix separately, and only include the easy one in
> > >> 1.10.1?
> > >>> Or
> > >>>>>> please
> > >>>>>>>>> just feel free to postpone the whole task to 1.10.2 if "all or
> > >>>>>> nothing"
> > >>>>>>>>> policy is preferred (smile). Thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 23:33, Till Rohrmann <
> > >> trohrm...@apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 for a soonish bug fix release. Thanks for volunteering as
> > >> our
> > >>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>> manager Yu.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I think we can soon merge the increase of metaspace size and
> > >>>>>> improving
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> error message. The assumption is that we currently don't have
> > >> too
> > >>>>>> many
> > >>>>>>>>>> small Flink 1.10 deployments with a process size <= 1GB. Of
> > >>> course,
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> sooner we release the bug fix release, the fewer deployments
> > >> will
> > >>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>> affected by this change.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> For FLINK-16018, I think there would be an easy solution which
> > >> we
> > >>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>>> include in the bug fix release. The proper fix will most
> likely
> > >>>> take
> > >>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>> bit
> > >>>>>>>>>> longer, though.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Till
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 8:08 PM Andrey Zagrebin <
> > >>>>>> azagre...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> @Andrey and @Xintong - could we have a quick poll on the
> > >> user
> > >>>>>>>>>> mailing
> > >>>>>>>>>>> list
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> about increasing the metaspace size in Flink 1.10.1?
> > >>>> Specifically
> > >>>>>>>>>> asking
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> for who has very small TM setups?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> There has been a survey about this topic since 10 days:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> `[Survey] Default size for the new JVM Metaspace limit in
> > >> 1.10`
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I can ask there about the small TM setups.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 5:19 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Another blocker for 1.10.1: FLINK-16576 State inconsistency
> > >>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>> restore
> > >>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> memory state backends
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Let me recompile the watching list with recent feedbacks.
> > >>>>>> There're
> > >>>>>>>>>>> totally
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 45 issues with Blocker/Critical priority for 1.10.1, out of
> > >>>>>> which 14
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> already resolved and 31 left, and the below ones are
> > >> watched
> > >>>>>>>>>> (meaning
> > >>>>>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> once the below ones got fixed, we will kick of the
> > >> releasing
> > >>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>> left
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ones
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> postponed to 1.10.2 unless objections):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Blockers (7)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16018 Improve error reporting
> > >>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>> submitting
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> batch job (instead of AskTimeoutException)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes
> > >>> Metaspace
> > >>>>>> OOM
> > >>>>>>>>>> error
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> on repeated job submission
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16170 SearchTemplateRequest
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ClassNotFoundException
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> when use flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16262 Class loader problem with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE and usrlib
> > >> directory
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [Closed] FLINK-16406 Increase default value for JVM
> > >>>>>> Metaspace to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> minimise its OutOfMemoryError
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [Open] FLINK-16454 Update the copyright year in NOTICE
> > >>>> files
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [Open] FLINK-16576 State inconsistency on restore with
> > >>>> memory
> > >>>>>>>>>> state
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> backends
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Critical (4)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [Open] FLINK-16047 Blink planner produces wrong
> > >> aggregate
> > >>>>>>>>>> results
> > >>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> state clean up
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [PR Submitted] FLINK-16070 Blink planner can not
> > >> extract
> > >>>>>> correct
> > >>>>>>>>>>> unique
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> key for UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [Under Discussion] FLINK-16225 Metaspace Out Of Memory
> > >>>>>> should be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> handled as Fatal Error in TaskManager
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>  - [Open] FLINK-16408 Bind user code class loader to
> > >>> lifetime
> > >>>>>> of a
> > >>>>>>>>>> slot
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please raise your hand if you find any other issues should
> > >> be
> > >>>> put
> > >>>>>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> list, thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please also note that 1.10.2 version is already created
> > >>> (thanks
> > >>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> help @jincheng), and feel free to adjust/assign fix version
> > >>> to
> > >>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 18:21, Stephan Ewen <
> > >> se...@apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @Andrey and @Xintong - could we have a quick poll on the
> > >>> user
> > >>>>>>>>>> mailing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> list
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> about increasing the metaspace size in Flink 1.10.1?
> > >>>>>> Specifically
> > >>>>>>>>>>> asking
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for who has very small TM setups?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 6:23 AM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the reminder Stephan and the
> > >> inputs/discussion
> > >>>>>>>>>> Andrey and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong. I totally agree that we should try best not to
> > >>>>>>>>>> introduce new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues when resolving the existing one. Will watch
> > >>> closely
> > >>>>>>>>>> about the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion and conclusion around metaspace
> > >> configuration.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the point as a developer instead of RM, I'm
> > >>> optimistic
> > >>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reserving
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 160MB more memory to JVM metaspace by default won't
> > >>> cause a
> > >>>>>> big
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> problem,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on the assumption that nowadays assigning 2GB/4GB
> > >>>>>> memory
> > >>>>>>>>>> per TM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the common case.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 09:54, Xintong Song <
> > >>>>>>>>>> tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think in FLINK-16406 we have not only increased the
> > >>>>>> default
> > >>>>>>>>>> value
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metaspace, but also increased the 'process.size' in
> > >>>> default
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'flink-conf.yaml'.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That means:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - For people using the default 'flink-conf.yaml',
> > >>> it's
> > >>>>>> not
> > >>>>>>>>>>> really
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> taking
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   memory from heap / managed for metaspace.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - For people using custom configuration files:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      - If they are specifying 'flink.size', then
> > >>>> metaspace
> > >>>>>>>>>> does
> > >>>>>>>>>>> not
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      affect the flink memory internal components
> > >>> (heap,
> > >>>>>>>>>> managed,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      - If they are specifying 'process.size' (most
> > >>>> likely
> > >>>>>>>>>> active
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> setups),
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      then they will have less heap / managed memory,
> > >>> or
> > >>>>>>>>>> worse,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> their
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      configuration may not work without adjustment.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         - For a TM with large process memory (e.g.,
> > >> 4
> > >>> GB
> > >>>>>> or
> > >>>>>>>>>> more),
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         probably ok that the metaspace takes 160 MB
> > >>> more
> > >>>>>>>>>> memory.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         - For a TM with smaller total memory (1 or 2
> > >>> GB)
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> metaspace
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         increase is more likely to cause problem.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So basically only people have small 'process.size' in
> > >>>>>> custom
> > >>>>>>>>>> config
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> file
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are really affected. I'm not sure what is the
> > >>> proportion
> > >>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>> such
> > >>>>>>>>>>> use
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> though. (From questions asked on the user ML,
> > >> probably
> > >>>> not
> > >>>>>>>>>> much).
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you~
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong Song
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:09 PM Stephan Ewen <
> > >>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No need to revert it now - I am not saying it
> > >> should
> > >>>> not
> > >>>>>> go
> > >>>>>>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.10.1,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am just saying this is not clear to me yet.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have to trade off the fact that we may break
> > >> some
> > >>>>>>>>>> deployments
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact that we will "safe" a lot of new deployments.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I simply lack the data points / insight at the
> > >> moment
> > >>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>> understand
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> how
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> significant both cases are, meaning how many users
> > >>>> would
> > >>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> affected
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how badly.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Independent of that, improving the error message is
> > >>>>>> always
> > >>>>>>>>>>> helpful.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:22 PM Andrey Zagrebin <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> azagrebin.apa...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  - For 1.10.1 I am not completely sure,
> > >> because
> > >>>>>> users
> > >>>>>>>>>> expect
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that without config adjustments. That might not
> > >>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>> possible
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, makes sense, I will revert it for 1.10 and
> > >> only
> > >>>>>> try to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> improve
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message and docs.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 Mar 2020, at 13:15, Stephan Ewen <
> > >>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Andrey about the increase in metaspace size
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  - I have no concerns for 1.11.0.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  - For 1.10.1 I am not completely sure,
> > >> because
> > >>>>>> users
> > >>>>>>>>>> expect
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that without config adjustments. That might not
> > >>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>> possible
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:55 PM Andrey
> > >> Zagrebin
> > >>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> azagrebin.apa...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About "FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes
> > >> Metaspace
> > >>>> OOM
> > >>>>>>>>>> error
> > >>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeated
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job”
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My understanding that the issue is basically
> > >>>> covered
> > >>>>>>>>>> by:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-16225] Metaspace Out Of Memory should
> > >>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>> handled as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fatal
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Error
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in TaskManager
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  no full consensus there but improving error
> > >>>>>> message
> > >>>>>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> existing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> task
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread fatal handling could be done at least
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-16406] Increase default value for JVM
> > >>>>>>>>>> Metaspace to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimise
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OutOfMemoryError
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  see further
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-16246] Exclude
> > >>> "SdkMBeanRegistrySupport"
> > >>>>>> from
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dynamically
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loaded
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AWS connectors
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not sure whether this is a blocker but looks
> > >>>> close
> > >>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About "FLINK-16406 Increase default value for
> > >>> JVM
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Metaspace"
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Have we consensus that this is okay for a
> > >>>> bugfix
> > >>>>>>>>>> release?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setups, takes away memory from heap / managed
> > >>>>>> memory
> > >>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> existing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setups
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that keep their flink-conf.yaml.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My understanding was that increasing to 256m
> > >>>>>> resolved
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reported
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problems
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we decided to make the change so I have
> > >>> merged
> > >>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>> today
> > >>>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no more concerns.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there are concerns I can revert it.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the other hand, I think improving the
> > >> message
> > >>>>>> error
> > >>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the metaspace option should help the most
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because user would not have to read all docs
> > >> to
> > >>>> fix
> > >>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then maybe this change is not even needed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12 Mar 2020, at 12:28, Stephan Ewen <
> > >>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good idea to go ahead with 1.10.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About "FLINK-16142 Memory Leak causes
> > >> Metaspace
> > >>>> OOM
> > >>>>>>>>>> error
> > >>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeated
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job"
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I don't think we have consensus on the
> > >> exact
> > >>>>>>>>>> solution,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> yet,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the changes might also have side effects that
> > >>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>> hard to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> predict,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not sure we should rush this in.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About "FLINK-16406 Increase default value for
> > >>> JVM
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Metaspace"
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Have we consensus that this is okay for a
> > >>>> bugfix
> > >>>>>>>>>> release?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setups, takes away memory from heap / managed
> > >>>>>> memory
> > >>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> existing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setups
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that keep their flink-conf.yaml.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We may need to unblock the release form these
> > >>> two
> > >>>>>>>>>> issues
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> having 1.10.2 in the near future.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:15 AM Yu Li <
> > >>>>>>>>>> car...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the reminder Jark. Will keep an
> > >> eye
> > >>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>> these
> > >>>>>>>>>>> two.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 12:32, Jark Wu <
> > >>>>>>>>>> imj...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for driving this release, Yu!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to start 1.10.1 release cycle.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From the Table SQL module, I think we
> > >> should
> > >>>> also
> > >>>>>>>>>> try to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> get
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following issues:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16441: Allow users to override
> > >>>> flink-conf
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> parameters
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLI
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environment
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this allows users to set e.g. statebackend,
> > >>>>>>>>>> watermark
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> interval,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly-once/at-least-once, in the SQL CLI
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16217: SQL Client crashed when any
> > >>>>>> uncatched
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> exception
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thrown
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this will improve much experience when
> > >> using
> > >>>> SQL
> > >>>>>> CLI
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jark
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 20:37, Yu Li <
> > >>>>>>>>>> car...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the suggestion Andrey! I've
> > >> added
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.10.1 into
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-16225
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions and promoted its priority to
> > >>>> Critical.
> > >>>>>>>>>> Will
> > >>>>>>>>>>> also
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progress of FLINK-16108/FLINK-16408.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 18:18, Andrey
> > >>> Zagrebin
> > >>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> azagre...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yu,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for kicking off the 1.10.1 release
> > >>>>>>>>>> discussion!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apart from
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16406 Increase default value for
> > >>> JVM
> > >>>>>>>>>> Metaspace
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimise
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OutOfMemoryError
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which should be merged soon
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should also try to get in the
> > >>>>>> following
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-16225] Metaspace Out Of Memory
> > >>>> should
> > >>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>> handled
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fatal
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Error
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TaskManager
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This should solve the Metaspace problem
> > >>> even
> > >>>>>> in a
> > >>>>>>>>>>> better
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> way
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OOM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure should point users to the docs
> > >>>>>> immediately
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-16408] Bind user code class
> > >> loader
> > >>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> lifetime
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slot
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This should give a better protection
> > >>> against
> > >>>>>> class
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> loading
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaks
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - [FLINK-16018] Improve error reporting
> > >>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>> submitting
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> batch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (instead
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of AskTimeoutException)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This problem has recently happened for
> > >>>> multiple
> > >>>>>>>>>> users
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrey
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:46 AM Jingsong
> > >>> Li <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jingsongl...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for driving. Yu. +1 for starting
> > >>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.10.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some issues are very important, Users
> > >> are
> > >>>>>> looking
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> forward
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jingsong Lee
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 2:52 PM Yangze
> > >>> Guo <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> karma...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for driving this release, Yu!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for starting the 1.10.1 release
> > >> cycle.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yangze Guo
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:42 PM Xintong
> > >>>> Song
> > >>>>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the explanation.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've no concerns. I was just trying to
> > >>> get
> > >>>>>> some
> > >>>>>>>>>>> inputs
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prioritizing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks on my side, and ~1month sounds
> > >>> good
> > >>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> me.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you~
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong Song
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:15 PM Yu
> > >> Li <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> car...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bq. what is the time plan for 1.10.1?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the history, the first
> > >>> patch
> > >>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> major
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take ~1month from discussion started,
> > >>>>>>>>>> depending on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue resolving:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 1.8.1: started discussion on May
> > >> 28th
> > >>>>>> [1],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> released
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jul
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * 1.9.1: started discussion on Sep
> > >> 23rd
> > >>>>>> [3],
> > >>>>>>>>>>> released
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oct
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19th
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We won't rush to match the history of
> > >>>>>> course,
> > >>>>>>>>>> but
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference. And please feel free to
> > >> let
> > >>> me
> > >>>>>>>>>> know if
> > >>>>>>>>>>> any
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concerns
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Releasing-Flink-1-8-1-td29154.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flink-1-8-1-released-td30124.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Releasing-Flink-1-9-1-td33343.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flink-1-9-1-released-td34170.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 11:54, Xintong
> > >>>> Song
> > >>>>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tonysong...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Yu, for the kick off and
> > >>>>>> volunteering
> > >>>>>>>>>> to be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the proposal.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One quick question, what is the time
> > >>>> plan
> > >>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.10.1?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you~
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xintong Song
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:51 AM
> > >>>> Zhijiang
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <wangzhijiang...@aliyun.com
> > >> .invalid>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for driving this release,
> > >> Yu!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 on my side
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zhijiang
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From:Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Send Time:2020 Mar. 10 (Tue.) 20:25
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To:dev <dev@flink.apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing
> > >> Flink
> > >>>>>> 1.10.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the supplement Hequn.
> > >> Yes
> > >>>> will
> > >>>>>>>>>> also
> > >>>>>>>>>>> keep
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> an
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eye
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> existing blocker issues.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 19:10, Hequn
> > >>>>>> Cheng <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Yu,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for raising the
> > >>>> discussion
> > >>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found there are some other
> > >>> issues[1]
> > >>>>>>>>>> which are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> marked
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16454 Update the copyright
> > >>>> year
> > >>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> files
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16262 Class loader problem
> > >>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>> FlinkKafkaProducer.Semantic.EXACTLY_ONCE
> > >>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> usrlib
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16170
> > >> SearchTemplateRequest
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ClassNotFoundException
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-sql-connector-elasticsearch7
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16018 Improve error
> > >>> reporting
> > >>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> submitting
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (instead
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AskTimeoutException)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These may also need to be resolved
> > >>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1.10.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hequn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/versions/12346891
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:48 PM Yu
> > >>> Li
> > >>>> <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> car...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jincheng,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, your help would be very
> > >>> helpful.
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> lot!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 at 18:24,
> > >>>> jincheng
> > >>>>>>>>>> sun <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sunjincheng...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for bring up the
> > >> discussion
> > >>>>>> Yu. I
> > >>>>>>>>>> would
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> like
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hand
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the last stage when the RC is
> > >>>>>>>>>> finished.(If you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jincheng
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> 于2020年3月10日周二
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 下午5:49写道:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has been almost one month
> > >>> since
> > >>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>>> released
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flink
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.10.0. We
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have more than 40 resolved
> > >>>>>>>>>> improvements/bugs
> > >>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-1.10
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I propose to start the
> > >> 1.10.1
> > >>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> cycle.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most noticeable fixes are:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16241 [legal] Remove
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> license and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notice
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-ml-lib
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> module
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16313 Fix RocksDB
> > >>> resource
> > >>>>>> leak
> > >>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flink-state-processor-api
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16161 Statistics zero
> > >>>> should
> > >>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>> known
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HiveCatalog
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-2336
> > >>>>>>>>>> ArrayIndexOufOBoundsException in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TypeExtractor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mapping
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16108 StreamSQLExample
> > >> is
> > >>>>>>>>>> failed if
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blink
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planner
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16139 Co-location
> > >>>> constraints
> > >>>>>>>>>> are not
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reset
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> task
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recovery
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DefaultScheduler
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16414 Create udaf/udtf
> > >>>>>> function
> > >>>>>>>>>> using
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> sql
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> casuing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ValidationException: SQL
> > >>> validation
> > >>>>>>>>>> failed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, I think the
> > >>> following
> > >>>>>>>>>> issues
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.10.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release (especially the
> > >> Metaspace
> > >>>> OOM
> > >>>>>>>>>> issue):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16142 Memory Leak
> > >> causes
> > >>>>>>>>>> Metaspace
> > >>>>>>>>>>> OOM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeated
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> submission
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16406 Increase default
> > >>>> value
> > >>>>>>>>>> for JVM
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Metaspace
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minimise
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OutOfMemoryError
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16047 Blink planner
> > >>>> produces
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrong
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aggregate
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean up
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - FLINK-16070 Blink planner can
> > >>> not
> > >>>>>>>>>> extract
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unique
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UpsertStreamTableSink
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would volunteer as the
> > >> release
> > >>>>>>>>>> manager and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> kick
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once blocker issues are merged.
> > >>>> What
> > >>>>>> do
> > >>>>>>>>>> you
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there are any concerns or
> > >>>> missing
> > >>>>>>>>>> blocker
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.10.1, please let me know.
> > >>> Thanks.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yu
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to