+1 for the consolidation

Best,
Andrey

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:38 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for unifying Deployment / Docker, Dockerfiles and Release System /
> Docker into Docker.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 12:18 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we now have 3 components containing the word "docker":
> > - Deployment / Docker
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+FLINK+AND+component+%3D+%22Deployment+%2F+Docker%22
> > >
> > (63
> > issues)
> > - Dockerfiles
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+FLINK+AND+component+%3D+Dockerfiles
> > >
> > (12
> > issues)
> > - Release System / Docker
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+FLINK+AND+component+%3D+%22Release+System+%2F+Docker%22
> > >
> > (3
> > issues)
> >
> > I would suggest consolidating these three components into one, as there
> are
> > not that many tickets for this aspect of Flink.
> > Maybe we should just rename "Deployment / Docker" to "flink-docker", and
> > merge the two other components into it?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:47 AM Patrick Lucas <patr...@ververica.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Chesnay!
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:26 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've added a "Release System / Docker" component.
> > > >
> > > > On 21/02/2020 11:19, Patrick Lucas wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Could someone with permissions add a new component to the FLINK
> > project
> > > > in
> > > > > Jira for the Docker images <https://github.com/apache/flink-docker
> >?
> > > > >
> > > > > There is already a "Deployment / Docker" component, but that's not
> > > quite
> > > > > the same as maintenance/improvements on the flink-docker images.
> > > > >
> > > > > Either top-level "Docker Images" or perhaps "Release / Docker
> Images"
> > > > would
> > > > > be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Patrick
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to