You right, Yu. Thanks for pointing that out.
And thanks for volunteering, Xintong.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:31 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe I can help drive this release, if there's no one else volunteering.
> I've been managing the 1.11.3 and 1.12.1 releases. The bugfix release
> process is still warm in my mind. :)
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:09 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for having a bugfix release for the 1.10 branch to fix the security
>> issue.
>>
>> Thanks for driving the discussion Matthias!
>>
>> Minor: CVE-2020-17519 is introduced by 1.11.0 [1] so we don't need to fix
>> it in 1.10.3, but CVE-2020-17518 [2] is needed.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yu
>>
>> [1] https://s.apache.org/CVE-2020-17519
>> [2] https://s.apache.org/CVE-2020-17518
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 16:57, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for starting this discussion Matthias. I agree with all of you
>> that
>> > a final 1.10.3 release could be really helpful for our users. Given
>> that CI
>> > passes, it shouldn't be too much overhead either.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Till
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:45 AM Xingbo Huang <hxbks...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks for starting this discussion, Matthias.
>> > >
>> > > +1 for releasing 1.10.3 as it contains a number of important fixes.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Xingbo
>> > >
>> > > Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> 于2021年1月13日周三 下午3:46写道:
>> > >
>> > > > Thanks for bringing this up, Matthias.
>> > > >
>> > > > Per the "Update Policy for old releases" [1], normally we do not
>> > release
>> > > > 1.10.x after 1.12.0 is released. However, the policy also says that
>> we
>> > > are
>> > > > "open to discussing bugfix releases for even older versions".
>> > > >
>> > > > In this case, I'm +1 for releasing 1.10.3, for the dozens of
>> > > non-released
>> > > > fixes and the security flaws.
>> > > >
>> > > > As a reminder, I'd like to bring up FLINK-20906 [2] to be
>> backported if
>> > > we
>> > > > are releasing 1.10.3, which updates the copyright year in NOTICE
>> files
>> > to
>> > > > 2021.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you~
>> > > >
>> > > > Xintong Song
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > [1] https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html
>> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20906
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 7:15 PM Matthias Pohl <
>> matth...@ververica.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > I'd like to initiate a discussion on releasing Flink 1.10.3. There
>> > > were a
>> > > > > few requests in favor of this already in [1] and [2].
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I checked the release-1.10 branch: 55 commits are not released,
>> yet.
>> > > > > Some non-released fixes that might be relevant are:
>> > > > > - FLINK-20218 [3] - fix "module 'urllib' has no attribute 'parse'"
>> > due
>> > > to
>> > > > > ProtoBuf version update
>> > > > > - FLINK-20013 [4] - BoundedBlockingSubpartition may leak network
>> > buffer
>> > > > > - FLINK-19252 [5] - temporary folder is not created when missing
>> > > > > - FLINK-19557 [6] - LeaderRetrievalListener notification upon
>> > ZooKeeper
>> > > > > reconnection
>> > > > > - FLINK-19523 [7] - hide sensitive information in logs
>> > > > >
>> > > > > In addition to that, we would like to include a backport for
>> > > > CVE-2020-17518
>> > > > > and CVE-2020-17519 to cover the request in [2].
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The travis-ci build chain for release-1.10 seems to be stable [8].
>> > > > > Any thoughts on that? Unfortunately, I cannot volunteer as a
>> release
>> > > > > manager due to the lack of permissions. But I wanted to start the
>> > > > > discussion, anyway.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best,
>> > > > > Matthias
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [1]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Weekly-Community-Update-2020-44-45-td46486.html#a47610
>> > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20875
>> > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20218
>> > > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20013
>> > > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19252
>> > > > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19557
>> > > > > [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19523
>> > > > > [8] https://travis-ci.com/github/apache/flink/builds/212749910
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>
>

Reply via email to