+1 for releasing 1.12.2, and thanks for volunteering to be our release manager Yuan.
Besides the mentioned issues, I could see two more blockers with 1.12.2 as fix version [1] and need some tracking: * FLINK-21013 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21013> Blink planner does not ingest timestamp into StreamRecord * FLINK- 21030 <http://Broken job restart for job with disjoint graph> Broken job restart for job with disjoint graph Best Regards, Yu [1] https://s.apache.org/flink-1.12.2-blockers On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 08:57, Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for being our release manager Yuan. > > We found a out of memory issue [1] which will affect most batch jobs thus I > think > it would be great if we can include this fix in 1.12.2. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20663 > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 12:36 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Thanks for volunteering for being our release manager Yuan :-) > > > > +1 for a timely bug fix release. > > > > I will try to review the PR for FLINK- 20417 [1] which is a good fix to > > include in the next bug fix release. We don't have to block the release > on > > this fix though. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20417 > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:12 PM Piotr Nowojski <pnowoj...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Thanks Yuan for bringing up this topic. > > > > > > +1 for the quick 1.12.2 release. > > > > > > As Yuan mentioned, me and Roman can help whenever committer rights will > > be > > > required. > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long lasting bug > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , wish this would be merged > > in > > > this release. > > > > > > I will push to speed up review of your PR. Let's try to merge it before > > > 1.12.2, but at the same time I wouldn't block the release on this bug. > > > > > > Best, > > > Piotrek > > > > > > pt., 5 lut 2021 o 12:12 郁蓝 <happyhacker...@foxmail.com> napisał(a): > > > > > > > Hi Yuan, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long lasting bug > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , wish this would be > merged > > > in > > > > this release. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ > > > > 发件人: > > > > "dev" > > > > < > > > > yuanmei.w...@gmail.com>; > > > > 发送时间: 2021年2月5日(星期五) 晚上6:36 > > > > 收件人: "dev"<dev@flink.apache.org>; > > > > > > > > 主题: [DISCUSS] Releasing Apache Flink 1.12.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey devs, > > > > > > > > One of the major issues that have not been resolved in Apache Flink > > > 1.12.1 > > > > is "unaligned > > > > checkpoint recovery may lead to corrupted data stream"[1]. Since the > > > > problem is now fixed and > > > > it is critical to the users, I would like to kick off a discussion on > > > > releasing Flink 1.12.2 that > > > > includes unaligned checkpoint fixes. > > > > > > > > I would like to volunteer myself for managing this release. But I > > noticed > > > > that some of the release > > > > steps may require committer authorities. Luckily, Piotr and Roman are > > > very > > > > kind to provide help > > > > on such steps. > > > > > > > > Apart from the unaligned checkpoint issue, please let us know in this > > > > thread if there are any > > > > other fixes that we should try to include in this version. I'll try > to > > > > communicate with the issue > > > > owners and come up with a time estimation next week. > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20654 > > > > > > > > Best > > > > Yuan > > > > > >
