+1 (non-binding) - built from source code with scala 2.11 succeeded - submit state machine example and it runed well with expected commit id shown in UI. - enable state latency tracking with slf4j metrics reporter and all behaves as expected. - Click 'FlameGraph' but found the we UI did not give friendly hint to tell me enable it via setting rest.flamegraph.enabled: true, will create issue later.
Best Yun Tang ________________________________ From: Leonard Xu <xbjt...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 16:52 To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.0, release candidate #2 +1 (non-binding) - verified signatures and hashes - built from source code with scala 2.11 succeeded - started a cluster, WebUI was accessible, ran some simple SQL jobs, no suspicious log output - tested time functions and time zone usage in SQL Client, the query result is as expected - the web PR looks good - found one minor exception message typo, will improve it later Best, Leonard Xu > 在 2021年4月29日，16:11，Xingbo Huang <hxbks...@gmail.com> 写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > - verified checksum and signature > - test upload `apache-flink` and `apache-flink-libraries` to test.pypi > - pip install `apache-flink-libraries` and `apache-flink` in mac os > - started cluster and run row-based operation test > - started cluster and test python general group window agg > > Best, > Xingbo > > Dian Fu <dian0511...@gmail.com> 于2021年4月29日周四 下午4:05写道： > >> +1 (binding) >> >> - Verified the signature and checksum >> - Installed PyFlink successfully using the source package >> - Run a few PyFlink examples: Python UDF, Pandas UDF, Python DataStream >> API with state access, Python DataStream API with batch execution mode >> - Reviewed the website PR >> >> Regards, >> Dian >> >>> 2021年4月29日 下午3:11，Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 写道： >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> - checked/verified signatures and hashes >>> - started cluster and run some e2e sql queries using SQL Client, results >>> are as expect: >>> * read from kafka source, window aggregate, lookup mysql database, write >>> into elasticsearch >>> * window aggregate using legacy window syntax and new window TVF >>> * verified web ui and log output >>> - reviewed the release PR >>> >>> I found the log contains some verbose information when using window >>> aggregate, >>> but I think this doesn't block the release, I created FLINK-22522 to fix >>> it. >>> >>> Best, >>> Jark >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 14:46, Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Matthias, >>>> >>>> I'd like to double confirm what Guowei said. The dependency is Apache 2 >>>> licensed and we do not bundle it in our jar (as it is in the runtime >>>> scope) thus we do not need to mention it in the NOTICE file (btw, the >>>> best way to check what is bundled is to check the output of maven shade >>>> plugin). Thanks for checking it! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Dawid >>>> >>>> On 29/04/2021 05:25, Guowei Ma wrote: >>>>> Hi, Matthias >>>>> >>>>> Thank you very much for your careful inspection. >>>>> I check the flink-python_2.11-1.13.0.jar and we do not bundle >>>>> org.conscrypt:conscrypt-openjdk-uber:2.5.1 to it. >>>>> So I think we may not need to add this to the NOTICE file. (BTW The >> jar's >>>>> scope is runtime) >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Guowei >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 2:33 AM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Dawid and Guowei for managing this release. >>>>>> >>>>>> - downloaded the sources and binaries and checked the checksums >>>>>> - built Flink from the downloaded sources >>>>>> - executed example jobs with standalone deployments - I didn't find >>>>>> anything suspicious in the logs >>>>>> - reviewed release announcement pull request >>>>>> >>>>>> - I did a pass over dependency updates: git diff release-1.12.2 >>>>>> release-1.13.0-rc2 */*.xml >>>>>> There's one thing someone should double-check whether that's suppose >> to >>>> be >>>>>> like that: We added org.conscrypt:conscrypt-openjdk-uber:2.5.1 as a >>>>>> dependency but I don't see it being reflected in the NOTICE file of >> the >>>>>> flink-python module. Or is this automatically added later on? >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding; please see remark on dependency above) >>>>>> >>>>>> Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:52 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Glad to hear that outcome. And no worries about the false alarm. >>>>>>> Thank you for doing thorough testing, this is very helpful! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:04 PM Caizhi Weng <tsreape...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> After the investigation we found that this issue is caused by the >>>>>>>> implementation of connector, not by the Flink framework. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry for the false alarm. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> 于2021年4月28日周三 下午3:23写道： >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @Caizhi and @Becket - let me reach out to you to jointly debug this >>>>>>>> issue. >>>>>>>>> I am wondering if there is some incorrect reporting of failed >> events? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 8:53 AM Caizhi Weng <tsreape...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> -1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We're testing this version on batch jobs with large (600~1000) >>>>>>>>> parallelisms >>>>>>>>>> and the following exception messages appear with high frequency: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2021-04-27 21:27:26 >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.flink.util.FlinkException: An OperatorEvent from an >>>>>>>>>> OperatorCoordinator to a task was lost. Triggering task failover >> to >>>>>>>>> ensure >>>>>>>>>> consistency. Event: '[NoMoreSplitEvent]', targetTask: <task name> >> - >>>>>>>>>> execution #0 >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.SubtaskGatewayImpl.lambda$sendEvent$0(SubtaskGatewayImpl.java:81) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniHandle(CompletableFuture.java:822) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniHandle.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:797) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Completion.run(CompletableFuture.java:442) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.AkkaRpcActor.handleRunAsync(AkkaRpcActor.java:440) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.AkkaRpcActor.handleRpcMessage(AkkaRpcActor.java:208) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.FencedAkkaRpcActor.handleRpcMessage(FencedAkkaRpcActor.java:77) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> org.apache.flink.runtime.rpc.akka.AkkaRpcActor.handleMessage(AkkaRpcActor.java:158) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.japi.pf.UnitCaseStatement.apply(CaseStatements.scala:26) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.japi.pf.UnitCaseStatement.apply(CaseStatements.scala:21) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>> scala.PartialFunction$class.applyOrElse(PartialFunction.scala:123) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.japi.pf >>>>>>> .UnitCaseStatement.applyOrElse(CaseStatements.scala:21) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>> scala.PartialFunction$OrElse.applyOrElse(PartialFunction.scala:170) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>> scala.PartialFunction$OrElse.applyOrElse(PartialFunction.scala:171) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>> scala.PartialFunction$OrElse.applyOrElse(PartialFunction.scala:171) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.actor.Actor$class.aroundReceive(Actor.scala:517) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.actor.AbstractActor.aroundReceive(AbstractActor.scala:225) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.actor.ActorCell.receiveMessage(ActorCell.scala:592) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.actor.ActorCell.invoke(ActorCell.scala:561) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.processMailbox(Mailbox.scala:258) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.run(Mailbox.scala:225) >>>>>>>>>> at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.exec(Mailbox.scala:235) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>> akka.dispatch.forkjoin.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:260) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> akka.dispatch.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1339) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> >> akka.dispatch.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1979) >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> akka.dispatch.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:107) >>>>>>>>>> Becket Qin is investigating this issue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
