Hi team, Thank you for your input, I am closing this vote as successful. Austin: thank you, I have added the experimental annotation explicitly to the FLIP.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > The @Experimental annotation is really missing, Marton could you add it > please? > > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:04 PM Austin Cawley-Edwards < > austin.caw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Márton, > > > > The FLIP looks generally good to me, though could we add the > > `@Experimental` annotation to the proposed interfaces so it is in sync > with > > what was agreed in the discussion thread? > > > > Thanks, > > Austin > > > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 9:40 AM Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > +1 from my side > > > > > > This is a good addition that will open many possibilities in the future > > and > > > solve some immediate issues with the current Kerberos integration. > > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 2:50 PM Márton Balassi < > balassi.mar...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, I would like to start a vote on FLIP-181 [1] which was > > > > discussed in this thread [2]. The vote will be open for at least 72 > > hours > > > > until July 9th unless there is an objection or not enough votes. > > > > > > > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/CAUBCw > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53b6b8931b6248a849855dad27b1a431e55cdd48ca055910e8f015a8%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > >
