Last remainder: unless there are any objections, I will proceed with deprecating these by the end of the week.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:28 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for deprecating and then dropping them. > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 3:31 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Francesco, > > > > thanks for starting this discussion. It is definitely time to clean up > > more connectors and formats that were used for the old planner but are > > actually not intended for the DataStream API. > > > > +1 for deprecating and dropping the mentioned formats. Users can either > > use Table API or implement a custom > > SerializationSchema/DeserializationSchema according to their needs. It > > is actually not that complicated to add Jackson and configure the > > ObjectMapper for reading JSON/CSV. > > > > Regards, > > Timo > > > > > > On 18.10.21 17:42, Francesco Guardiani wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > In flink-avro, flink-csv and flink-json we have implementations of > > > SerializationSchema/DeserializationSchema for the > > org.apache.flink.types.Row > > > type. In particular, I'm referring to: > > > > > > - org.apache.flink.formats.json.JsonRowSerializationSchema > > > - org.apache.flink.formats.json.JsonRowDeserializationSchema > > > - org.apache.flink.formats.avro.AvroRowSerializationSchema > > > - org.apache.flink.formats.avro.AvroRowDeserializationSchema > > > - org.apache.flink.formats.csv.CsvRowDeserializationSchema > > > - org.apache.flink.formats.csv.CsvRowSerializationSchema > > > > > > These classes were used in the old table planner, but now the table > > planner > > > doesn't use the Row type internally anymore, so these classes are > unused > > > from the flink-table packages. > > > > > > Because these classes are exposed (some have @PublicEvolving > annotation) > > > there might be some users out there using them when using the > DataStream > > > APIs, for example to convert an input stream of JSON from Kafka to a > Row > > > instance. > > > > > > Do you have any opinions about deprecating these classes in 1.15 and > then > > > drop them in 1.16? Or are you using them? If yes, can you describe your > > use > > > case? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > FG > > > > > > > > > -- > > Konstantin Knauf > > https://twitter.com/snntrable > > https://github.com/knaufk >