Hi Chesnay, It would be fine for me to have more high-over labels, like SQL, Connectors, Formats, FileSystems.
Thanks, Martijn On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 16:33, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote: > @Martijn do you need all the various sublabels, or would one like SQL or > Connectors suffice? > > On 25/11/2021 16:28, Martijn Visser wrote: > > Hi Nico, > > > > I'm using the labels to filter on PRs that I find interesting (for > example, > > I look at all the new or updated PRs that are related to SQL or > > connectors). > > > > Best regards, > > > > Martijn > > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 16:17, Nicolaus Weidner < > > nicolaus.weid...@ververica.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> since we are currently working on several infrastructure topics, I would > >> like to start a discussion on whether the component labeling on PRs is > >> actually helping people. To be clear, I am talking about the blue labels > >> like "component=Runtime/metrics" that are added by the omnipresent > Robert > >> to each PR on Github. They are currently copied over from Jira. > >> > >> So: > >> - Does anyone rely on the labels being present on Github in any way? > >> - If no, do you at least notice them and find them helpful, e.g. when > >> browsing open PRs? > >> > >> If it turns out that noone uses this feature anyway, we can drop this > >> mirroring of labels instead of spending time making improvements to it > (the > >> labels in Jira would stay, of course). > >> > >> Best, > >> Nico > >> > >
