I just wanted to check in on this, is there any interest in a PR to fix this issue? Looking at the master branch, it still looks to be a problem. Thanks.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:52 AM Galen Warren (Jira) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > Galen Warren created FLINK-25197: > ------------------------------------ > > Summary: Using Statefun RequestReplyFunctionBuilder fails > with Java 8 date/time type `java.time.Duration` not supported by default: > add Module > "org.apache.flink.shaded.jackson2.com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310" > to enable handling > Key: FLINK-25197 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25197 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Stateful Functions > Affects Versions: statefun-3.1.0 > Reporter: Galen Warren > Fix For: statefun-3.1.0 > > > When using RequestReplyFunctionBuilder to build a stateful functions job, > the job fails at runtime with: > > Java 8 date/time type `java.time.Duration` not supported by default: add > Module > "org.apache.flink.shaded.jackson2.com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310" > to enable handling > > It appears this is because, in > [RequestReplyFunctionBuilder::transportClientPropertiesAsObjectNode| > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/blob/b4ba9547b8f0105a28544fd28a5e0433666e9023/statefun-flink/statefun-flink-datastream/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/statefun/flink/datastream/RequestReplyFunctionBuilder.java#L127], > a default instance of ObjectMapper is used to serialize the client > properties, which now include a java.time.Duration. There is a > [StateFunObjectMapper| > https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/blob/master/statefun-flink/statefun-flink-common/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/statefun/flink/common/json/StateFunObjectMapper.java] > class in the project that has customized serde support, but it is not used > here. > > The fix seems to be to: > * Use an instance of StateFunObjectMapper to serialize the client > properties in RequestReplyFunctionBuilder > * Modify StateFunObjecdtMapper to both serialize and deserialize > instances of java.time.Duration (currently, only deserialization is > supported) > > I've made these changes locally and it seems to fix the problem. Would you > be interested in a PR? Thanks. > > > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira > (v8.20.1#820001) >