+1 Thanks for driving this, David. Thank you~
Xintong Song On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:28 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for bumping minimum supported Hadoop version to 2.8.5 > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 12:25 AM David Morávek <d...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > As there were no strong objections, we'll proceed with bumping the Hadoop > > version to 2.8.5 and removing the safeguards and the CI for any earlier > > versions. This will effectively make the Hadoop 2.8.5 the least supported > > version in Flink 1.15. > > > > Best, > > D. > > > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 11:03 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > If there are no users strongly objecting to dropping Hadoop support > for < > > > 2.8, then I am +1 for this since otherwise we won't gain a lot as > Xintong > > > said. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Till > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:33 AM David Morávek <d...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > Agreed, if we drop the CI for lower versions, there is actually no > point > > > > of having safeguards as we can't really test for them. > > > > > > > > Maybe one more thought (it's more of a feeling), I feel that users > > > running > > > > really old Hadoop versions are usually slower to adopt (they most > likely > > > > use what the current HDP / CDH version they use offers) and they are > less > > > > likely to use Flink 1.15 any time soon, but I don't have any strong > data > > > to > > > > support this. > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > >
