Hi Thomas, Thanks! I'll prepare the website PR and send out the VOTE in a couple of hours.
Best regards, Martijn On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 05:53, Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > Thank you Xingbo. I meanwhile also got my Azure pipeline working and > was able to build the artifacts. Although in general it would be nice > if not every release volunteer had to set up their separate Azure > environment. > > Martijn, > > The release is staged, except for the website PR: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12351075&projectId=12315522 > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.14.3-rc1/ > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1481/ > https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.14.3-rc1 > > Would you like to create the website PR and start a VOTE? > > (If not, I can look into that tomorrow.) > > Cheers, > Thomas > > > > On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 9:17 PM Xingbo Huang <hxbks...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Since multiple wheel packages with different python versions for mac and > > linux are generated, building locally requires you have multiple machines > > with different os and Python environments. I have triggered the wheel > > package build of release-1.14.3-rc1 in my private Azure[1] and you can > > download the wheels after building successfully. > > > > [1] > > > https://dev.azure.com/hxbks2ks/FLINK-TEST/_build/results?buildId=1704&view=results > > > > Best, > > Xingbo > > > > Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> 于2022年1月10日周一 11:12写道： > > > > > Hi Martijn, > > > > > > I started building the release artifacts. The Maven part is ready. > > > Currently blocked on the Azure build for the PyFlink wheel packages. > > > > > > I had to submit a "Azure DevOps Parallelism Request" and that might > > > take a couple of days. > > > > > > Does someone have the steps to build the wheels locally? > > > Alternatively, if someone can build them on their existing setup and > > > point me to the result, that would speed up things as well. > > > > > > The release branch: > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/release-1.14.3-rc1 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Thomas > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 9:14 PM Martijn Visser <mart...@ververica.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > > > Thanks for volunteering! There was no volunteer yet, so would be > great if > > > > you could help out. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > Op vr 7 jan. 2022 om 01:54 schreef Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > Hi Martijn, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for preparing the release. Did a volunteer check in with > you? > > > > > If not, I would like to take this up. > > > > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 7:11 AM Martijn Visser < > mart...@ververica.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you all! That means that there's currently no more blocker > to > > > start > > > > > > with the Flink 1.14.3 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > The only thing that's needed is a committer that's willing to > follow > > > the > > > > > > release process [1] Any volunteers? > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Creating+a+Flink+Release > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 03:17, Qingsheng Ren <renqs...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martjin, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FLINK-25132 has been merged to master and release-1.14. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your work for releasing 1.14.3! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Qingsheng Ren > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 26, 2021, at 3:46 PM, Konstantin Knauf < > kna...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Martijn, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FLINK-25375 is merged to release-1.14. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Konstantin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:02 PM David Morávek < > d...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Martijn, FLINK-25271 has been merged to 1.14 branch. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Best, > > > > > > > >> D. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 7:27 AM 任庆盛 <renqs...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> Hi Martjin, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Thanks for the effort on Flink 1.14.3. FLINK-25132 has been > > > merged > > > > > on > > > > > > > >>> master and is waiting for CI on release-1.14. I think it > can be > > > > > closed > > > > > > > >>> today. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Cheers, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Qingsheng Ren > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>> On Dec 21, 2021, at 6:26 PM, Martijn Visser < > > > > > mart...@ververica.com> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Hi everyone, > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> I'm restarting this thread [1] with a new subject, given > that > > > > > Flink > > > > > > > >>> 1.14.1 was a (cancelled) emergency release for the Log4j > > > update and > > > > > > > we've > > > > > > > >>> released Flink 1.14.2 as an emergency release for Log4j > updates > > > > > [2]. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> To give an update, this is the current blocker for Flink > > > 1.14.3: > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25132 - > > > KafkaSource > > > > > > > >>> cannot work with object-reusing DeserializationSchema -> @ > > > > > > > >>> renqs...@gmail.com can you provide an ETA for this ticket? > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> There are two critical tickets open for Flink 1.14.3. That > > > means > > > > > that > > > > > > > >> if > > > > > > > >>> the above ticket is resolved, these two will not block the > > > > > release. If > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > >>> can merge them in before the above ticket is completed, > that's > > > a > > > > > bonus. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25199 - > > > fromValues > > > > > does > > > > > > > >>> not emit final MAX watermark -> @Marios Trivyzas any > update or > > > > > thoughts > > > > > > > >> on > > > > > > > >>> this? > > > > > > > >>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25227 - > > > Comparing > > > > > the > > > > > > > >>> equality of the same (boxed) numeric values returns false > -> > > > > > @Caizhi > > > > > > > Weng > > > > > > > >>> any update or thoughts on this? > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Best regards, > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Martijn > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> [1] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/r0xhs9x01k8hnm0hyq2kk4ptrhkzgdw9 > > > > > > > >>>> [2] > > > > > > > > https://flink.apache.org/news/2021/12/16/log4j-patch-releases.html > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 17:21, David Morávek < > d...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> Hi Martijn, I've just opened a backport PR [1] for > FLINK-23946 > > > > > [2]. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/18066 > > > > > > > >>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23946 > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Best, > > > > > > > >>>> D. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:59 PM Fabian Paul < > fp...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> Actually I meant > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25126 > > > > > > > >>>> sorry for the confusion. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:55 PM Fabian Paul < > fp...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Hi Martijn, > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> I just opened the backport for > > > > > > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25132. The > > > changes > > > > > are > > > > > > > >>>>> already approved I only wait for a green Azure build. > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> Best, > > > > > > > >>>>> Fabian > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:01 PM Martijn Visser < > > > > > mart...@ververica.com > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks for the fixes Jingsong and Zhu! > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> That means that we still have the following tickets > open: > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23946 - > > > > > Application > > > > > > > >>> mode > > > > > > > >>>>>> fails fatally when being shut down -> A PR is there, > just > > > > > pending a > > > > > > > >>> review. > > > > > > > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25126 - > Kafka > > > > > > > >>> connector tries > > > > > > > >>>>>> to commit aborted transaction in batch mode -> I believe > > > this is > > > > > > > >>> pending a > > > > > > > >>>>>> backport, correct @fp...@apache.org <fp...@apache.org> > ? > > > > > > > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25132 - > > > > > KafkaSource > > > > > > > >>> cannot > > > > > > > >>>>>> work with object-reusing DeserializationSchema -> @ > > > > > > > >>> renqs...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>>>>> <renqs...@gmail.com> can you provide an ETA for this > > > ticket? > > > > > > > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25199 - > > > > > fromValues > > > > > > > >>> does not > > > > > > > >>>>>> emit final MAX watermark -> @Marios Trivyzas < > > > mat...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > >> can > > > > > > > >>> you > > > > > > > >>>>>> provide an ETA for this ticket? > > > > > > > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25227 - > > > Comparing > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > >>>>>> equality of the same (boxed) numeric values returns > false -> > > > > > > > >> @Caizhi > > > > > > > >>> Weng > > > > > > > >>>>>> <tsreape...@gmail.com> mentioned that a fix is planned > for > > > > > > > >>> today/tomorrow. > > > > > > > >>>>>> I am wondering if this is indeed a blocker for 1.14.1, > but > > > given > > > > > > > >>> that there > > > > > > > >>>>>> are still some blockers waiting to be merged we could > > > probably > > > > > > > >>> include it. > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Best regards, > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> Martijn > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 07:31, Caizhi Weng < > > > tsreape...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi devs! > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Sorry for the interruptions, but I just found an issue > [1] > > > > > (which > > > > > > > >>> I think > > > > > > > >>>>>>> is a blocking one) in every Flink version, including > Flink > > > > > > > >> 1.14.1. > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> For Flink < 1.15, this issue will cause incorrect > result > > > when > > > > > > > >> user > > > > > > > >>> cast > > > > > > > >>>>>>> two strings to numerics and compare the numerics. > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> I'm planning for a quick fix today or tomorrow. > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25227 > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月9日周四 10:48写道： > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> update: backport of FLINK-19142 is done > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Zhu > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月8日周三 19:35写道： > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi Martijn, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I'd like to backport the fix of FLINK-19142 to > 1.14.1. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> The backport is in progress. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Will update it here when it is done. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Zhu > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月8日周三 > > > 10:33写道： > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Martijn, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> We just created a cherry-pick pull-request for > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20370 > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> We could finish it as soon as possible. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Jingsong > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 10:25 PM Fabian Paul < > > > > > > > >> fp...@apache.org> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I just opened a PR for > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25126 > I'll > > > > > > > >>> expect to > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> merge > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> it sometime next week. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Fabian > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 10:49 AM Martijn Visser < > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> mart...@ververica.com> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just a status update on the open blockers for > 1.14.1: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22113 - > > > > > > > >>> UniqueKey > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> constraint is lost with multiple sources join in > SQL -> > > > I > > > > > > > >>> believe most > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> review comments have been fixed and it's just the > final > > > > > > > >> review > > > > > > > >>> remarks > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> before it's ready. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23946 - > > > > > > > >>> Application > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> mode fails fatally when being shut down -> @David > > > Morávek > > > > > can > > > > > > > >>> you > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> provide > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> an update? > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25022 - > > > > > > > >>> ClassLoader > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> leak with ThreadLocals on the JM when submitting a > job > > > > > > > >> through > > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> REST API > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> -> I think this is just pending on a merge to > master and > > > > > then > > > > > > > >>> creating > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> a > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> backport? > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25126 - > > > > > > > >>> Kafka > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> connector tries to commit aborted transaction in > batch > > > mode > > > > > > > >> -> > > > > > > > >>> This is > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> a > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> new blocker. @fp...@apache.org can you give an > update? > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25132 - > > > > > > > >>> KafkaSource > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> cannot work with object-reusing > DeserializationSchema -> > > > > > > > >>> There's a PR > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> that's being reviewed and then needs a backport. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> It would be great if we can finish all these > blockers > > > > > > > >> next > > > > > > > >>> week to > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> start a release. Do the assignees think that's > > > realistic? > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 14:25, Marios Trivyzas < > > > > > > > >>> mat...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22113 > > > will > > > > > > > >>> be merged > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> today (most probably) > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:15 AM Martijn Visser < > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> mart...@ververica.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks all for the updates! To summarize, these > are > > > > > > > >> open > > > > > > > >>> tickets > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> that are considered blockers for Flink 1.14.1: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22113 > > > - > > > > > > > >>> UniqueKey > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> constraint is lost with multiple sources join in > SQL -> > > > > > > > >> @Marios > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Trivyzas > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> can you give an estimate when you expect this to be > > > > > resolved? > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23946 > > > - > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Application > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> mode fails fatally when being shut down -> A patch > is > > > being > > > > > > > >>> prepared. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> @David Morávek do you have an estimate when this > patch > > > will > > > > > > > >> be > > > > > > > >>> there? > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24596 > > > - > > > > > > > >>> Bugs in > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> sink.buffer-flush before upsert-kafka -> @ > > > fp...@apache.org > > > > > > > >> has > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> provided > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> a PR is there, so I suspect it would take a couple > of > > > days > > > > > > > >>> before this > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> is > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> merged. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25022 > > > - > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ClassLoader > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> leak with ThreadLocals on the JM when submitting a > job > > > > > > > >> through > > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> REST API > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> -> @Chesnay Schepler has provided a PR, so I > suspect it > > > > > would > > > > > > > >>> also just > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> take a couple of days before this is merged. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anyone who can help me with creating > the > > > > > > > >> actual > > > > > > > >>> release > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> when these tickets are resolved > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 12:08, Chesnay Schepler < > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> ches...@apache.org> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-25022: I will open a PR later today, and > it > > > > > > > >>> should be > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> easy to > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backport. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-25027: Unlikely to make it for 1.14.1; I > also > > > > > > > >>> wouldn't > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> consider it > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/11/2021 19:40, Martijn Visser wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to start a discussion on > releasing > > > > > > > >> Flink > > > > > > > >>> 1.14.1. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Flink 1.14 > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was released on the 29th of September [1] and > so > > > far > > > > > > > >>> 107 > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> issues > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> have been > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolved, including multiple blockers and > critical > > > > > > > >>> priorities > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> [2]. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are currently 169 open tickets which > > > contain a > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> fixVersion > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> for 1.14.1 > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]. I'm including the ones that are currently > > > > > > > >> marked > > > > > > > >>> as > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> critical or a > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker to verify if these should be included > in > > > > > > > >>> Flink 1.14.1. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> It would be > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> great if those that are assigned or working > on one > > > > > > > >> or > > > > > > > >>> more of > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> these tickets > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can give an update on its status. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24543 > > > > > > > >> - > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Zookeeper > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> connection > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue causes inconsistent state in Flink -> I > > > think > > > > > > > >>> this > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> depends > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> on the > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outcome of dropping Zookeeper 3.4 as was > proposed > > > on > > > > > > > >>> the Dev > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> mailing list > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25027 > > > > > > > >>> - Allow > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> GC > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> of a > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finished job's JobMaster before the slot > timeout > > > is > > > > > > > >>> reached > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25022 > > > > > > > >> - > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> ClassLoader leak with > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ThreadLocals on the JM when submitting a job > > > through > > > > > > > >>> the REST > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> API > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24789 > > > > > > > >> - > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> IllegalStateException > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with CheckpointCleaner being closed already > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24328 > > > > > > > >>> - Long > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> term > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> fix for > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> receiving new buffer size before network > reader > > > > > > > >>> configured -> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if this would end up in Flink 1.14.1, I think > it's > > > > > > > >>> more likely > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> that it > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be Flink 1.15. Anton/Dawid, could you > > > confirm > > > > > > > >>> this? > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23946 > > > > > > > >> - > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Application mode > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fails fatally when being shut down -> This > depends > > > > > > > >> on > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24038 > > > > > > > >>> and I don't > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> see much > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happening there, so I also expect that this > would > > > > > > > >>> move to > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Flink > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> 1.15. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David, could you confirm? > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22113 > > > > > > > >> - > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> UniqueKey > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> constraint > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is lost with multiple sources join in SQL > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21788 > > > > > > > >>> - Throw > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PartitionNotFoundException if the partition > file > > > has > > > > > > > >>> been lost > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> for blocking > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shuffle -> I'm also expecting that this would > move > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > >>> Flink > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> 1.15, can you > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirm Yingjie ? > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are quite some other tickets that I've > > > > > > > >> excluded > > > > > > > >>> from > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> this > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> list, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because they are either test instabilities or > are > > > > > > > >> not > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> depending > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> on a Flink > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release to be resolved. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note: there are quite a few test > instabilities in > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > >>> list and > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> help on > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those is always appreciated. You can check all > > > > > > > >>> unassigned > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> tickets > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instabilities in Jira [4]. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any other open tickets that we > should > > > wait > > > > > > > >>> for? Is > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> there a PMC > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> member who would like to manage the release? > I'm > > > > > > > >> more > > > > > > > >>> than > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> happy > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> to help > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with monitoring the status of the tickets. > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > https://flink.apache.org/news/2021/09/29/release-1.14.0.html > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.14.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.14.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.14.1%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20test-stability%20AND%20assignee%20in%20(EMPTY)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20DESC > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn Visser | Product Manager > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mart...@ververica.com > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.ververica.com/> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward < > https://flink-forward.org/> - > > > > > > > >>> The Apache > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Flink > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Conference > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Marios > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Best, Jingsong Lee > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Konstantin Knauf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/snntrable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/knaufk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Martijn Visser | Product Manager > > > > > > > > mart...@ververica.com > > > > > > > > <https://www.ververica.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > Follow us @VervericaData > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink > > > > Conference > > > > > > > > Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time > > > >
