Looking at the linked official release documentation, I think this comment
is no longer valid. Moreover, I cannot find an explanation why some
projects are allowed to publish on npm and others not.

Cheers,
Till

On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 4:14 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:

> What is your explanation for the comment in the ticket then?
>
> On 24/01/2022 16:07, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> > I am not sure whether this is really a problem. There are other Apache
> > projects that publish their artifacts on npm already [1, 2].
> >
> > Also on the official release page [3] there it is written:
> >
> >> After uploading to the canonical distribution channel, the project (or
> > anyone else) MAY redistribute the artifacts in accordance with their
> > licensing through other channels.
> >
> > [1] https://www.npmjs.com/package/echarts
> > [2] https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-coho
> > [3]
> https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-distribution
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 3:54 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm concerned about a comment in
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19733 stating that npm is
> >> not an approved release channel.
> >> I don't really know what to make of it and neither the current nor past
> >> versions of the linked legal page shed some light on it.
> >>
> >> As such it would be a good idea to double-check whether we are even
> >> allowed to publish anything on NPM.
> >>
> >> On 24/01/2022 15:42, Ingo Bürk wrote:
> >>> Hi Till,
> >>>
> >>> speaking as someone who regularly works with JavaScript/TypeScript,
> >>> definitely a +1 from me to providing this on the npm registry to make
> >>> it an easy installation for developers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best
> >>> Ingo
> >>>
> >>> On 24.01.22 15:37, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> >>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to start a discussion about hosting
> >>>> StatefulFunction's JavaScript SDK [1] on npm. With the upcoming
> Statefun
> >>>> 3.2.0 release, the JavaScript SDK will be officially supported. In
> order
> >>>> for users to easily use this SDK, it would be very convenient if we
> make
> >>>> this dependency available via npm. Therefore, I propose to create a
> npm
> >>>> account that is governed by the PMC (similar to PyPI).
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have any concerns about this?
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24256
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Till
> >>>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to