+1 for the proposal.

@Hong : I feel that the inverted override flag should be a cluster setting
and not something the user can override at will. I fear that this might
defeat the purpose of the feature itself.
So I think we should add a config for this but not expose it on the rest api

Gyula

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:33 PM Teoh, Hong <lian...@amazon.co.uk.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 to this FLIP.
> This is very useful for teams building a Flink platform to run jobs from
> an external user
>
> +1 on Danny's comment on adding a configuration to allow inverted order of
> overrides.
> However, might it be better to include an "override" toggle in the REST
> API itself? That way we can change the flink configuration override
> behaviour without restarting the Flink cluster. This would make sense if we
> are thinking of a Session cluster and deploying multiple Flink jobs to the
> same cluster.
>
> Regards,
> Hong
>
>
> On 18/08/2022, 10:46, "Danny Cranmer" <dannycran...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> know the content is safe.
>
>
>
>     +1 thanks for driving this FLIP.
>
>     We actually have an internally forked equivalent of this, which is on
> our
>     list to try to upstream. Your proposal would *almost* work "off the
> shelf"
>     for us. We have an inverted order or priority:
>     - Rest API / Flink CLI > User Code > Cluster Config
>
>     This is because our end users do not submit their jobs directly, our
>     service does it on their behalf. For our usecase we do not want to
> allow
>     users to override certain values we set, since some are managed from
> our
>     service configuration, example: checkpointing interval.
>
>     How would you feel about including a cluster configuration to invert
> the
>     order? This could be decoupled to a follow-up FLIP.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Danny Cranmer
>
>
>     On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 7:21 AM Zheng Yu Chen <jam.gz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>     > This is a good suggestion, we can start this work after we finish the
>     > discussion and vote
>     >
>     > --
>     > Best
>     >
>     > ConradJam
>     >
>     >
>     > <zhanghao.c...@outlook.com> 于2022年8月15日周一 21:01写道:
>     >
>     > > I've created a new ticket [FLINK-28973] Extending
> /jars/:jarid/plan API
>     > to
>     > > support setting Flink configs - ASF JIRA (apache.org)<
>     > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28973>. for the job
> plan
>     > API.
>     > > Maybe we can create a new umbrella ticket for FLIP-256 and put
>     > FLINK-27060
>     > > & FLINK-28973 as subtasks. WDYT?
>     > >
>     > > Best,
>     > > Zhanghao Chen
>     > > ________________________________
>     > > From: zhengyu chen <jam.gz...@gmail.com>
>     > > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2022 18:06
>     > > To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
>     > > Subject: [DISCUSS] FLIP-256 Support Job Dynamic Parameter With
> Flink Rest
>     > > Api
>     > >
>     > > Hi all,
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > We would like to start a discussion thread on FLIP-256 Support Job
>     > Dynamic
>     > > Parameter With Flink Rest Api
>     > > <
>     > >
>     >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-256+Support+Job+Dynamic+Parameter+With+Flink+Rest+Api
>     > > >
>     > > [1]
>     > >
>     > > After the user submits the jar package, running a job through
> restapi
>     > > (/jars/:jarid/run) [2] can only pass in (allowNonRestoredState,
>     > > savepointPath, programArg, entry-class, parallelism) parameters,
> which is
>     > > obvious with the diversification of job parameters  (eg Checkpoint
>     > address)
>     > >
>     > > This solves the problem that the user can pass in other parameters
> when
>     > > submitting a job, avoiding the user to define these job parameters
> in the
>     > > code, resulting in the need to repackage the job for each
> modification
>     > >
>     > > There was some interest from users [3] from a meetup and the
> mailing
>     > list.
>     > > Looking forward to comments and feedback, thanks!
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > [1]
>     > >
>     > >
>     >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-256+Support+Job+Dynamic+Parameter+With+Flink+Rest+Api
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > [2]
>     > >
>     > >
>     >
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/ops/rest_api/#jars-jarid-run
>     > >
>     > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27060
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > --
>     > > Best
>     > >
>     > > ConradJam
>     > >
>     >
>
>

Reply via email to