Turns out the issue with the Helm installation was that I was using cert-manager 1.9.1 instead of the recommended version 1.8.2. The operator now deploys cleanly in my local environment.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:34 PM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) because the source release looks good. > > I've verified the following: > > 1. Downloaded, compiled, and verified the signature of the source release > staged at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-rc2/ > 2. Verified licenses (Not a blocker: the LICENSE file does not contain a > link to the bundled licenses directory, this should be fixed in future > releases) > 3. Verified the Helm Chart > > The Helm chart installation resulted in the following pod events: > > Events: > Type Reason Age From Message > ---- ------ ---- ---- ------- > Normal Scheduled 5m42s default-scheduler > Successfully assigned default/flink-kubernetes-operator-54fcd9df98-645rf > to docker-desktop > Warning FailedMount 3m39s kubelet Unable to > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached > volumes=[kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore flink-operator-config-volume]: > timed out waiting for the condition > Warning FailedMount 92s (x10 over 5m42s) kubelet > MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "keystore" : secret > "webhook-server-cert" not found > Warning FailedMount 84s kubelet Unable to > attach or mount volumes: unmounted volumes=[keystore], unattached > volumes=[flink-operator-config-volume kube-api-access-pdnzw keystore]: > timed out waiting for the condition > > Do we need to list any additional steps in the docs? > https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/try-flink-kubernetes-operator/quick-start/ > > -Max > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:16 PM Őrhidi Mátyás <matyas.orh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> - Verified source distributions (except the licenses and maven artifacts) >> - Verified Helm chart and Docker image >> - Verified basic examples >> >> Everything seems okay to me. >> >> Cheers, >> Matyas >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:27 PM Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image tag, >> build, >> > version >> > - Verified examples + checked operator logs everything looks as expected >> > - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no binaries >> > - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source successfully >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Gyula >> > >> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:27 AM Jim Busche <jbus...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 (not-binding) >> > > >> > > Thank you Gyula, >> > > >> > > >> > > Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks good, >> > > logs look normal >> > > >> > > podman Dockerfile build from source looks good. >> > > >> > > twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good: >> > > ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf >> > > >> > > UI and basic sample look good. >> > > >> > > Checksums looked good. >> > > >> > > Tested on OpenShift 4.10.25. Will try additional versions (4.8 and >> 4.11) >> > > if I get an opportunity, but I don't expect issues. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thank you, >> > > >> > > James Busche >> > > >> > >> >
